Assuming you're correct, question is...why not? That is what would be most important to investors to know. I don't believe the ans is "not enough time yet", and in the meantime if your $making theory is right, more & more losses to longs can & will occur. 100% focus need be on determining the true pwr of the patent portfolio. This is a CALL OUT...... to any 3rd party tech experts who can definitively ans this question about any 1 or all of the patents. Get you voices & your knowledge on here & let's get this done or stop the losses. The way it's going, by the time there's an imminent possibility of a deal, there'll be some new technology to say, "who cares, seeya"... To all those that are so into believing what a lock this is or are laser focusing their kumbaya's energy, that's all fine & good, but your playing a million to 1 shot, so maybe need to get MORE real. What's MORE real? It's seeing 3rd party experts directly explain, demonstrate or otherwise show, that any of these patents are truly truly "foundational" and if they can & do get on here & contribute in that way, not only will they help themselves but it guaranteed will get that pps moving at least to the point where it's more comfortable or a jump point, moving fwd. And if there are those knowledgeable folks who can show the opposite, ie, anything to demonstrate the patents ARE NOT the panacea, and have real facts to bear, COME... SPEAK!! because at this point, basically blind belief in the mumbo jumbo of the patents language & in the bod, is simply not enough, for many methinks... You?
