InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 512
Posts 60003
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: Carini post# 45598

Sunday, 08/31/2014 8:06:05 AM

Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:06:05 AM

Post# of 59584
You were correct......sort of.

There was a 20 day timeline for Huffy/Klein to respond in order to prevent a hearing from being held. After 20 days the Judge granted the motion.

Besides, we said as much. I was wrong, and I that too was discussed as it relates to the Judge ruling. I said she could rule on the motion after 20 days, when in fact she simply could grant the request for the hearing after 20 days with no response from the other side.

I have no problem saying I'm wrong.

It happens.

Hope this helps.

BTW.....what do you think of the "shell hijacking" charges being level at "So" now?

Just surious Counsel.