Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:06:05 AM
There was a 20 day timeline for Huffy/Klein to respond in order to prevent a hearing from being held. After 20 days the Judge granted the motion.
Besides, we said as much. I was wrong, and I that too was discussed as it relates to the Judge ruling. I said she could rule on the motion after 20 days, when in fact she simply could grant the request for the hearing after 20 days with no response from the other side.
I have no problem saying I'm wrong.
It happens.
Hope this helps.
BTW.....what do you think of the "shell hijacking" charges being level at "So" now?
Just surious Counsel.
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM