Lol! I love 'facts' without the actual basis of how the industry even works. There's like 7 pieces here that are so off-base it's not even worth going into.
But just things like THEY are somehow supposed to be responsible for the release of a LICENSED product. Lol! Anyways, if a piece got pushed back, and trying to rope that into 'ITS A LIE! ITS A SCAM!' Haha! There's such a big chasm between the two. And knowing the difference is a bit important.
And that's all that really needs to be known about these poor arguments. They jump so quick from 'he's bad at business' to 'it's a huge scam', and that fact these two seem to swap back and forth but are actually completely different just shows how inconsistent these actually are.
The only 'facts' are ya, Nick definitely did make mistakes, as does anyone running a company and especially turning one around. He set projections based on circumstances that changed. So dwelling on it now is kind of funny and a waste of time.
But the 'it's a scam' argument ran it's course SO long ago, it's a waste of time now. No scam, not even close. And Nick isn't the CEO, but actually laid a few pieces of impressive groundwork, which again, is why dwelling on things yet to come is such a waste, bc it's FAR from complete.
Oh, btw, just like all of these, recently it was 'there is no bar. It'll never be released' and on and on and on. I notice that was scratched off of the list, like many other items, since the bad arguments have to keep changing so often. And many more will as well...
But seriously, this early in a business, during the standard growth timeframe they're still in, most of these can even go on the list of 'who cares?' I'm not in this for today or next week, they've got plenty of time , and are hitting certain markers I wanted to see and they should be at this time in a build--and some a bit early...seems like it might pay to know what those are...
Truth is, at this time this is only good for flipping, or as a long term hold to establish long cap gains until they complete their base plan, but it's pretty predictable. I mean, the investors will come when certain groundwork is established, not before, there's less risk, but less reward. It's not like they're gonna buy in heavy based off of a projection when the basis of what needs to be established for that to occur isn't even formed yet, as finicky as it is in this industry. That'd be a horrible idea...
As for long term holders, ya, I know plenty, and over 150 million EASY being held, most at the correct buy-in, so even at these levels they're seeing a bit of green, so not worried about that either...
Oh ya, facts. Coupled with actual industry knowledge, they're pretty handy....
AI
