Saturday, August 30, 2014 1:08:51 AM
Remember, this is Peter Michaels. Didn't he insist that no reverse split was in the works last time Hop-On reverse split... two weeks after he made those emphatic claims.
Didn't Hop-On file an amendment to do a reverse split earlier this year? Wasn't this about the same time Pete was insisting on no reverse split, all while mentioning* to a shareholder that called him that a reverse split might not be that bad of a thing?
*If you want more examples of why I don't believe a word coming out of CEO Petey's mouth, read past posts from others posting opinions critical to Hop-ON and its subsidiaries. Some posters have a lot of knowledge of pete's past schemes and the trouble he is/has been in....serious and/or civil actions. Some states throw debtors in jail for not paying what they owe or the judgments assessed by court action.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM