InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 3086
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/27/2011

Re: Snizzle post# 28339

Wednesday, 08/27/2014 6:16:33 PM

Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:16:33 PM

Post# of 28870
I haven't come across that name before.

One possibility is that after Kritsky pulled his license from RENU, he hooked up with this guy, to continue profiting off of his license.

It's pretty clear that Cox stayed on, and in the PR that was put out announcing the SDI acquisition, it was stated that he (Cox) was responsible for obtaining needed permits.

If Cox continued to use Kritsky's license, then Cox needs to be the target of any investigation and civil suit, and precisely why RENU has commenced the suit vs him.

When you add in all of the other garbage going on: incomplete work, stiffing customers and then rallying them to complain and start a class action suit, etc etc, that is when you see all of these other guys firmly entrenched in the whole mess.

AFAIK, this Bathalter guy might just be a non related party here. But, I will further investigate, just to make certain.