Wavedreamer....To your Samsung post I would say this. We thought the same thing when DELL put Wave inside the box.. While that was quite a coup, it did not stop the dilution and the bleeding of cash from the company and shareholders. The Samsung deal is already over 2 years old, May 30, 2012, and has produced hardly anything in measurable revenue. I'd bet the DELL revenues were much higher over that same timeframe and if my recall isn't too foggy, the Wave product was only in laptops at that point but ICBW. I get the impression the wavoids feel that Samsung would offer a greater array of opportunity.
Sandisk "To provide the ease of encryption to everyone, SanDisk is including a license for Wave's EMBASSY Security Center with every X300s. While Windows 8 provides native support for hardware encryption through eDrive, most corporations are still using Windows 7 and that only provides software based BitLocker encryption. Moreover, eDrive has a rather strict set of hardware and software requirements, which can be a dealbreaker if dealing with older hardware with no UEFI and/or TPM support. In addition to Wave, the X300s has been certified by McAfee, WinMagic, Check Point, Softex, and Absolute for Opal encryption in case you or your company already has security software."
Yes I am well aware there are a few names on that list that Wave is associated with, and still the reveues from the SED barely moves the meter.
I see articles touting the revenue growth of Sandisk's SSD line and I see growth touted in Micron, but I don't see any mentions of the headway this new technology is having on these established brands as it pertains to the revenues.
That is a problem. This company has had alliances with large companies in the past that amounted to slightly more than nada.
At the end of the day what good are these names if they can't even contribute an ante?
AI
