TaxiCaT, here's the big difference between the two...
I understand your logic with comparing AVOP to INCC. However, here's the big difference. Before you read this, understand that I am in both AVOP and INCC.
INCC realized that they had too large of an OS with it being slightly over 4 Billion shares. So INCC retired 3 Billion shares. AVOP has a huge OS, but they need to realize that most of those shares that they have that are just sitting there needs to be retired as like what INCC realized. This would help AVOP to get fundamentally on track.
Then INCC indicated that they are going to reduce their Authorized Shares (AS) down to 2 Billion shares down from 8.9 Billion. Again, this is a move that AVOP needs to do.
INCC has a marijuana license to grow marijuana within the state of Colorado that was approved. If AVOP could get a license to grow marijuana then such would be very positive for the company. After considering the time that have been placed in their few ventures now versus the lack of interest from the public, the AVOP CEO might bode well to put more time towards bringing in a huge marijuana cultivation operations.
INCC has up to 251 acres to grow/cultivate marijuana. The property can be confirmed of its existence through a government database. If AVOP could get into some cultivation then such could prove to be positive for the company to. Again, so far, there seems to be a lack of public interest with its current ventures. Currently, in my opinion, the AVOP current ventures need a little more substance. I believe its coming so I will continue to hold and wait.
INCC CEO and IR keep shareholders updated through Twitter and Facebook. This makes a difference because releasing too many PRs could look like the company would be pumping when they might be only trying to keep shareholders informed. INCC still have the "skull and crossbones" but they are expected to be removed soon per the updates from the company through Twitter. The SEC approved the use of social media for companies to keep their shareholders informed. It would be good if AVOP was to do such instead of allowing so long of time to elapse without communicating with shareholders, especially since these means of communication have been approved as official means of communication.
My last point to consider would be that if 80% of the AVOP OS is truly restricted, then those shares would help if they were converted to preferred and given non-dilutive rights where they only would have voting control rights so that they keep control of their company.
I think you get my point, but what will be even more important would be for AVOP to get my point.
v/r
Sterling
