InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 8736
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/26/2006

Re: None

Saturday, 08/23/2014 10:52:00 AM

Saturday, August 23, 2014 10:52:00 AM

Post# of 123597
I can summarize the massively wrong opinion of shorting of this scam. How can an opinion that pyct is massively shorted be considered wrong? If there is zero evidence to support the opinion and ample evidence to refute the shorting claim.....it will be considered wrong.


Opinion: Claims that pyct is massively shorted, one would have to guess at the amount based solely on if a trade is settled in 30 seconds or not ... If one seems to think that any trade not settled in 30 seconds has to be shorted then they are arguing from incomplete data. Trades have 3 days to settle before triggering an FTD...which leaves any tracking of shorts lacking any proof or as was stated "Therefore, your conclusion is not verifiable, and only your opinion"...and now a wrong one.

Counter: Use of the official SEC tracking reports on FTDs. They have a more up to date accounting of when trades settle and when they don't (trigger an FTD). www.sec.gov/foia/docs/failsdata.htm . This seems rather verifiable.



Logic and reason are not on this scams side.