InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 504
Posts 75327
Boards Moderated 20
Alias Born 10/14/2009

Re: None

Thursday, 08/21/2014 4:28:57 PM

Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:28:57 PM

Post# of 50866

¶ 70 Here, Chua is the directing mind of Oriens; he is Oriens and is just as accountable
as Oriens.
Clearly, Oriens obtained the investors’ funds. Although it is not
necessary to find that a respondent has been personally enriched before ordering
disgorgement, in this case, we have found that Chua was personally enriched by
the misconduct.
We agree with the executive director that it is appropriate to
require Oriens and Chua to disgorge the entire US$58,500.

¶ 71 The executive director also asks us to make a disgorgement order against
Anderson. But Anderson was much less culpable than Chua, and had a limited
role in the misconduct. He was not personally enriched. Although he was a
director and officer, Oriens was Chua’s company and Anderson had no real
control over it. It is not appropriate to require Anderson to disgorge the illegally
raised funds.



http://www.bcsc.bc.ca/Inc/ViewDoc.asp?DocNum=K7J7M6E5M7G4Q7O9E6XDQ7NEK7C3&s=False

The scope of the BCSC investigation was not broad enough IMO. Hopefully the SEC is looking into the relationship of OTHM to PGGG and other scams like Chimera.

OTHM "invested" one million in shareholder money in PGGG. Yeah right. Invested in enriching each others pockets at the expense of the public IMO.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/PGGG/profile

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MSSV News