InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 901
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2006

Re: Pyrrhonian post# 17741

Thursday, 08/21/2014 3:31:02 PM

Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:31:02 PM

Post# of 690100
Pyrr, I'm in agreement. If DCVax-L was seeing no advantage in efficacy, then SoC event rates would be seen in both cohorts, and 66 events would have been seen long before Dec 2013.

So, IMO it is clear that better than SoC PFS rates (taking longer) are being seen. And further, the BSSR resizing methodology indicates that the PFS rates being seen are much better than expected in the initial trial design.

The net net to me is that the likelihood DCVax-L is a home run has increased, but will take longer to prove based on the mechanics of the BSSR method and consequent increased enrollment.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News