T M M Inc (TMMI)

[jay14]

LLOL,this was already discussed back 8/2013 The defendants already said that they would call ISI if they had their Motion Denied;This is old news, read the minutes from August 2013!!. Mr. Zhong argued that ISI is a necessary party and they must be joined in the case. Further, Mr. Zhong advised the 1996 agreement is between ISI and the plaintiff.Hearsay Further arguments by counsel. COURT ORDERED, Motion GRANTED, noting ISI must be added as an additional party. Mr. Zhong to prepare the order.So where did TMM,Inc make a mistake and where is the big old mess you're talking about.You just showed your hand!!. Do you understand how the legal system works, besides the minutes haven't even been released yet to the public, so if you're quoting word for word from the minutes, that haven't even been released to the public yet, that would make you a chum of the defendants and that would be expected from yourside,on this message board;Good luck with your endeavors, as this was a win for the plaintiffs and not the defendants......Late to the dinner,as expected
TMMI TRUDEF moves onward and upward Worldwide!!.