T M M Inc (TMMI)

[Whazzup]

Ok TMM,inc who care? Whazzup not new is all over internet. Looked up court notes here are:

08/14/2014 8:30 AM
- Mr. Stover advised an answer has not been filed and the opposition from the Defendants opposition states the other party has not been included, noting they are a necessary party. Further, Mr. Stover advised the Defendant should answer the counter claims and they should be dispositive of the motion. Court noted they should be a party as a practical matter. Mr. Stover argued that they do not need to be a party and advised he will submit a motion to add them if they answer. Further, Mr. Stover advised they have the right to bring trade secrets into the case as they are exclusive licensees. Mr. Stover advised the Defendants have the burden to show they cannot afford relief and they are fine moving forward without ISI, noting ISI has not claimed any issues related to the case. Mr. Zhong argued that ISI is a necessary party and they must be joined in the case. Further, Mr. Zhong advised the 1996 agreement is between ISI and the plaintiff. Further arguments by counsel. COURT ORDERED, Motion GRANTED, noting ISI must be added as an additional party. Mr. Zhong to prepare the order.

Look like mr frack up right everyone else wrong TMM,inc has to add ISI-HP to case.