InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 5134
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 08/05/2002

Re: gumball post# 3546

Saturday, 08/16/2014 10:25:02 AM

Saturday, August 16, 2014 10:25:02 AM

Post# of 9334
Gumball,

There is no take to have on the 10Q. Hasn't changed from Q to Q beyond the latest progress on the research front.

Ya ever notice the negative comments say things like "probably" and "maybe" and "scam" ....... Yet no evidence and can't even get the basic facts down.

Mags "probably" owns 50%+ of the company ...... looking at the filings and doing the math would tell you what he owns. Insider ownership is widely accepted as very positive for a public company. Yet for some reason, its a negative for HEPI. Apparently can't figure out how many shares and warrants there are even though they are listed in every filing. ROFLMAO

There are claims that Mags couldn't give a shit about shareholders. Funny I didn't see any evidence to support that claim and in another sentence sez HEPI would be BK without his money. Well shareholders would have been screwed already if Mags hadn't been providing funding. The simple facts are that Mags does not have to do a damn thing to have the assets of HEPI. All he has to do is ask for his money. Fact.

Then conveniently a mention of RCPI as proof scams can last for years. Irrelevant to HEPI. HOWEVER ..... IT DOES SHOW OTHER COMMENTS MADE REGARDING HEPI CLAIMING A CURE FOR THINGS ARE HORSECHIT. Big brother would have come calling on HEPI. Funny .... No evidence of that. RCPI also highlights the regulatory environment we are up against and companies can't claim squat without having the evidence to prove it. Hence the extensive testing process HEPI has to go through.

Amigo Mike
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ZIVO News