Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:23:53 PM
I was going to post snippets of what I found the most funny but realized there was no point. The whole thing is hilarious.
The one part I wish they would have elaborated on was this....
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Inolife Technologies, Inc. v. Sharon P. Berthold, 14 CVS 3156-Forsyth County, North Carolina:
This is an action against a former officer of the Company. Counsel for Inolife believes that the litigation has no material detrimental effect to the Company’s financial situation.
The Company is currently not involved in any other litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations
It only explains why Sharon was removed from her positions in the company.
IT IS WHAT IT IS.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM