InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 135
Posts 13928
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/05/2013

Re: TheHungryHippo post# 37550

Saturday, 08/02/2014 12:55:21 AM

Saturday, August 02, 2014 12:55:21 AM

Post# of 133793
Ok, so why would the other two companies be kept in the dark though? That's what I keep wondering. What's the benefit to any of the involved parties or shareholders by making the merger seem simpler or smaller? I think the deal makes sense for all 3 and UNGS, are you thinking that there is a private merger between aureco, intos, and signifi with signifi maintaining controlling interest and then merging with UNGS (being acquired but gaining control)?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.