InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 132
Posts 39936
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/19/2003

Re: SoarinG post# 30760

Tuesday, 07/29/2014 8:19:45 PM

Tuesday, July 29, 2014 8:19:45 PM

Post# of 85462
That's the same line of reasoning the MW/RW cabal used before when ATJ first posted the 2013 revenue numbers. Those 2013 numbers proved to be accurate in every respect. All the hootin' and hollerin' by the IFUS cheerleaders about them just being idle and malicious speculation was shown to be baseless talking point chatter; probably orchestrated by those way over invested.

These 2014 numbers will prove to just as accurate as the 2013 numbers. And there is nothing positive about less than $40K revenue over a six month period when investors were told the monthly revenue would be in the $Million$.

Don't over look the main point though. If this were a legitimate company, there would be no speculation, one way or the other as quarterly reports would have been published by now.

"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"