Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:00:25 AM
I was wondering the same thing. Maybe that term is referring to the multiple claims that PV was going to get $120K from IFUS and how the PV case was somehow an example of terrible management of IFUS by MW?
Also, speaking of the PV case does anybody know what happened officially? There were many claims on this board warning us investors that the PV case was going to be a damaging blow to IFUS. Yet it seems to have come and gone with nothing impacting IFUS? I am relatively new to IFUS, but if the PV character ended up getting nothing from IFUS, that outcome would seem material wouldn't it?
I realize companies don't really comment on the outcome of legal cases, but if things are being said about IFUS that are patently false, it might be good to hear some kind of official news that might get past the lawyers (if that is possible).
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM