Interesting cm comment.
"What few here have understood is the litany of obstacles in the path of TC."
huh. obstacles. i remember some folks talked about obstacles.
presumably they were in amongst the dead leaves in wave's pipeline. but i don't remember ss warning investors to expect no increase in revenues due to obstacles. i remember ss talking about contracts that were on the verge of being signed.
for myself, i don't measure a ceo by their thought leadership. i measure them by the revenue and profits they generate.
but for some, it seems shareholder equity is merely a vehicle for their own sense of higher purposes. maybe the purposes are worthwhile. but why should wave shareholders bear their costs, without full and frank disclosure that this is wave's real purpose?
"wave is a non-profit organisation whose duty is to promote us military interests."
who knew? if only ss had mentioned that this was what he was up to!! i'm sure loads of people would have opted just to give their money away so the dod didn't have to pay for its development costs. and ss could gather his praise as a thought leader. while investors' capital was destroyed.
in hindsight, excuses are good so long as they suggest things were beyond wave's control.
in real time, believe in ss' pipeline. it's gonna be huge.
AI
