True. 3rd time filing and Huffy/Klein have failed......
to respond again. How do you not respond to ownership of MILLION$ in shares? I'm sure the Judge will be "axed" that by Mr. Cook.
The first case they get checking account records but fail to remove Zo as CEO.
The second time they file to remove Zo as CEO, they also file with Sunbiz ON THE SAME DAY that they've had taken a shareholder vote and Zo was removed by a majority. Zo responded and asked for documentation. Huffy/Klein never responded. Why would one need to file to remove Zo if the shareholders did? Show proof of a corporate action, don't just submit an amendment claiming as much.
The third time Huffy/klein have regurgitated idiotic claims or filed ridiculous lawsuits, they were called out for their fraud and have failed to provide proper documentation of ownership. Some of Huffy's supporters have suggested Zo could lose, which is beyond bizarre and shows.....well, you know.
That said, Zo needs to consider getting rid of some lawyers who appear to be dragging their feet.
Why is the chill not removed?
Like Huffy, the current legal team (other than Cook) appears to be digging a hole for Zo. He should demand they get things done or else. This is first grade type crap he's dealing with.
A deposit chill.......geez. Yet we have (ahem) "sleuths" suggesting shares are/were being issued left and right AND being deposited.
I'm done here until we see some results going forward. But the Tampa case is not an/the issue. It's just noise.
GL
