Friday, July 18, 2014 9:56:15 PM
TX jury found CWRN complied w the JVA- which is the important thing,and was not unjustly enriched by Geo- not that they didnt deserve anything,an interpretation elsewhere
and reason why CWRN was not unjustly enriched as Geo argued was because CWRN alleged Geo withheld and or commingled millions,which either equaled or exceeded Geos contribution is my take on it
remember Geo only took a small slice of the larger cake -the slice most favorable to geo - and geo even lost on the small slice most favorable to geo -so thats about the best possible result for CWRN
Anyway, good TX result in what was set up from the get go as a 1 sided case that didnt take into account CWRN's side, especially w all the discovery etc games imo played by Geo
CWRN's side/wish list to be heard in CA,and good TX case result bodes well for CWRN's case in CA
Imo. Do your dd before investing. I'm not a financial adviser nor compensated for my posts. They don't believe what they say, so why should you?
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp Reports Exceptionally High-Grade Results from Lucero • May 14, 2024 7:00 AM
VAYK Added New Manager for Expansion into $64 Billion Domestic Short-term Rental Market • VAYK • May 14, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM