Friday, July 18, 2014 9:56:15 PM
TX jury found CWRN complied w the JVA- which is the important thing,and was not unjustly enriched by Geo- not that they didnt deserve anything,an interpretation elsewhere
and reason why CWRN was not unjustly enriched as Geo argued was because CWRN alleged Geo withheld and or commingled millions,which either equaled or exceeded Geos contribution is my take on it
remember Geo only took a small slice of the larger cake -the slice most favorable to geo - and geo even lost on the small slice most favorable to geo -so thats about the best possible result for CWRN
Anyway, good TX result in what was set up from the get go as a 1 sided case that didnt take into account CWRN's side, especially w all the discovery etc games imo played by Geo
CWRN's side/wish list to be heard in CA,and good TX case result bodes well for CWRN's case in CA
Imo. Do your dd before investing. I'm not a financial adviser nor compensated for my posts. They don't believe what they say, so why should you?
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM