There's no evidence that shows it was not a pump. There's no evidence to show it's anticipation. I agree it's profit taking but there's no evidence to show the profit taking is from people that bought at .12. And nobody suggested any negative reports on the claim.
My point was and is, that if the theory is suggested that the increase in share price and volume might suggest the survey results would be released earlier, then the same theory (with opposite data) suggests that the decrease in share price and the decrease in volume suggests the results will be released later.
My point was sarcastically stating that the initial theory was a bit wonky. Oh, and that the 100% bullish chart signal at .22 turned out to be 100% incorrect. Supporting my theory that charting penny stocks is silly.
Let's wait for those results!!
This post is my opinion and should not be used as investment advice.
