InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 245
Posts 55847
Boards Moderated 12
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: scion post# 320

Tuesday, 07/08/2014 12:11:45 PM

Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:11:45 PM

Post# of 489
From: TEDennis 7/8/2014 11:50:31 AM
of 2435

IAS/RaPower3 issue #1

From the Yahoo forum:

From the RagingBull forum:

I have a list of SEVERAL IAS/RaPower3 issues that haven't been addressed satisfactorily -- if at all. Some of those issues are technology related, and some issues are business related. Where would you like to start?

Hey, I know. Let's start with the original "CPA Opinion Letter" from Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell back in 2006. EIGHT YEARS AGO. That's the one that looked like somebody forged HBM's letterhead. I have a long list of discrepancies between a REAL HB&M letterhead, and the letterhead that was used for the "CPA Opinion Letter". We can discuss each of those discrepancies if you would like. Was the "CPA Opinion Letter" a forgery? That's not for me to decide, but if one of those official organizations wants to see my list of *verifiable* discrepancies, all they have to do is ask. What's your opinion on that letter? It contained HB&M's official opinion on tax credits. Would a reputable CPA firm send out a letter like that on something other than their own official letterhead? Considering the legal ramifications of doing something like that, I doubt it. Perhaps somebody should call HB&M and ask them about it. Their website is hbmcpas -- not hbmepas, like it says on the bogus letterhead.

TED

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.