Followers | 16 |
Posts | 2067 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/28/2011 |
Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:06:21 PM
We'll guess what? I'm pretty sure the Plaintiff's lawyer took the Defendant's advise. Sheez !! Not sure what to say..
But to add to what was just posted, I believe the exact verbiage states:
"I declare under penalty of perjury that the reinstatement has been authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction or by the duly elected board of directors of the entity or if the entity has no board of directors, its equivalent of such board.
I declare, to the best of my knowledge under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is correct and acknowledge that pursuant to NRS 239.330, it is a category C felony to knowingly offer any false or forged instrument for filing in the Office of the Secretary of State."
Can anyone here describe to me what it means when it states "the duly elected board of directors of the entity"?
Does Exobox have a "duly elected board of directors"? I don't know if we do or don't. But I bet we're going to find out real soon.
Just my opinions!!
Go EXBX !!!!
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM