InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 12861
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/16/2001

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/02/2014 7:12:43 PM

Wednesday, July 02, 2014 7:12:43 PM

Post# of 28677
If [graphene] is combined with other ballistic resistant materials, the potential may be [greater.]

Good Grief, Every major (i.e. successful a.k.a selling) armor manufacture under the sun has ALREADY engaged this possibility.

Meaning, Even if Bourque Industries Kryron armor is for real, not a hoax, and superior to existing armor now available, these so called inferior armor plates comparied to Kryron's may exceed Kryron's when the graphene is added.

YES, Even if Kryron's armor has the graphene added eventually, the already higher cost of Kryron's armor to existing will place our armor continuously higher than the so called inferior armor.

BUT, The inferior armor of other manufactures with graphene will exceed today's Kryron armor.

Like That Saying, "No sales person ever lost their job buying crapola from IBM."

So Yes Virginia, No law enforcement or government agency will purchase non-graphene Kryron armor at the same price of the inferior with graphene when they exhibit the same armor protection.

To Make it CLEAR, Kryron armor WITH graphene will be too pricey for a massive (aka very large order that this company NEEDS) sale BECAUSE if the Kryron story of today is true NO additional ballistic protection is needed for the needs of the "average" body armor requirements.

Bottom Line: Graphene is not only many many years ahead (5-10) before it can be produced at a scale and cost where everyday applications find it as an additive, it will only show up in armor plates for very limited and special applications where cost is not an issue, not an area this company can obtain a revenue for success.

Doug