Tornado Alley (PROG)

[F6]

Devout Mormon wanted to take out “sinners” who smoked cigarettes or took the lord’s name in vain


Jared Michael Padgett

A young devout Mormon who went of shooting rampage in Oregon wanted to take out “sinners” who smoked cigarettes or took the lord’s name in vain, his journal has revealed.

By Neil Fetherston
Sunday 15th June 2014

Jared Michael Padgett (15) killed fellow student, 14-year old Emilio Hoffman, in the boys’ locker room, and also shot and injured a teacher, before taking his own life after exchanging gunfire with police in his suburban high school last week.

Padgett, a member of of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, was described as being very active in the church, along with his father and older brother.

According to Church elder Earl Milliron, the shooter was “highly regarded for his spirituality.”

Police say his journal, recovered after his death, hinted that he had plans to kill classmates, though it’s not clear when the entries were written, and they do not give a specific date for the intended reign of terror.

The journal did, however, contain passages targeting “sinners” who smoked cigarettes or took the lord’s name in vain.

On Tuesday morning, Padgett arrived at Reynolds High School carrying a guitar case and duffel bag. He was armed with an AR-15 type rifle, a semi-automatic handgun, hundreds of rounds of ammunition and a large knife.

Police say Padgett got the weapons from his family’s home.

Copyright 2014 Sunday Newspapers Ltd

http://www.sundayworld.com/top-stories/crime-desk/donal-macintyre-s-crime-cafe/devout-mormon-on-shooting-rampage-wanted-to-take-out-sinners [with comments]


--


'Highly spiritual’ Oregon high school shooter Jared Padgett wrote plans to kill 'sinners' in diary: police


Police said alleged Oregon school shooter Jared Padgett detailed his plans to kill his school’s ‘sinners’ in his journal.
Facebook


Police say Padgett fatally shot a student and injured a teacher Tuesday before turning the gun on himself.
STEVE DIPAOLA/REUTERS


Freshman Emilio Hoffman was killed in the attack, police said.
Facebook

Police found the alleged shooter's diary in his family's Oregon home. The 15-year-old's detailed plans did not name specific people as targets, police said. A leader at the teen's Mormon church said Padgett was 'highly regarded for his spirituality.'

BY Meg Wagner
Saturday, June 14, 2014, 9:45 AM

The 15-year-old freshman who opened fire on his Oregon high school Tuesday wanted to kill "sinners," the teen wrote in his diary.

Jared Padgett, an active member of an Gresham, Ore., Mormon church, shot and killed a student and injured a teacher during the attack on Reynolds High School before turning the gun on himself, police said.

While searching through the teen's home, officers found his journal, Portland's KGW reported [ http://www.kgw.com/news/Source-Reynolds-High-suspect-had-plan-to-kill-sinners--263099451.html ].

In the diary, Padgett detailed plans to kill the "sinners" at his school, police said.

No specific students or teachers were named as targets. His writings did not outline how or when the killings would occur, police said.

Padgett was a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

Church elder Earl Milliron told the TV station [ http://www.kgw.com/home/Mormon-elder-Reynolds-suspect-was-highly-regarded-for-his-spirituality--262781811.html ] that the 15-year-old was "highly regarded for his spirituality."

The teen, his brother and his father were all active in their Oregon church, Milliron said.

Milliron also said Padgett's parents' "tragic" divorce — which heavily affected the teen's dad — could have had an influence on the 15-year-old's mental health.

On Friday, the freshman's dad, Michael Padgett, released a statement to Oregon's FOX 12 [ http://www.kptv.com/story/25773138/reynolds-shootoing-jared-padgett-father ].

"We are finding it very difficult to put into words our state of mind and emotions," he wrote. "We are at a loss as to how and why this tragedy unfolded."

He continued: "Our family does not condone and has never promoted violence or hatred toward anyone. The values that we have taught our children are love in Jesus Christ, compassion, forgiveness, and patience."

On Tuesday, Padgett brought a rifle, a handgun and a knife — all of which had been locked up in his family's home — to school, police said.

He allegedly gunned down 14-year-old Emilio Hoffman in the school's locker room and shot and injured a teacher.

Police found Padgett's body in a school restroom with a self-inflicted gunshot would, officers said.

*

Related Stories

Ore. school shooting victim’s friend: ‘I just want answers’
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/ore-school-shooting-victim-friend-answers-article-1.1825952

Oregon high school shooter's sister feared he was victim
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/oregon-high-school-shooter-sister-feared-victim-article-1.1826058

Ore. becomes site of latest school shooting; Obama angry over gun violence
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/shooting-oregon-high-school-sparks-lockdown-report-article-1.1823812

*

© Copyright 2014 NYDailyNews.com

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/oregon-school-shooter-wrote-plan-kill-sinners-cops-article-1.1829711 [with embedded video report, and comments]


--


The Daily Forecast



Jun 13, 2014

http://www.allvoices.com/cartoons/c/105194314-the-daily-forecast [no comments yet]


--


What I Have Never Understood About US Failure in Gun Control

by Raza Habib Raja
Posted: 06/14/2014 6:48 pm EDT Updated: 06/14/2014 6:59 pm EDT

I am one of those people who have been fortunate to come to the U.S. and study. I came here in 2011 and graduated from Cornell in 2013. And let me admit, when I came here, like many others, I fell in love with this magical place.

It was an amazing experience to see a highly diverse society living in overall harmony. I have developed a high respect for the way the American state treats its citizens; its constitution is committed to protect life, liberty and property of its citizens. And, on the whole, the U.S. has done its job well.

And of course, I have also developed high respect for its democracy. It is an eye-opening experience to see how democracy actually works in a highly diversified and complex environment. Of course, the U.S. has the advantage of around 250 years of evolution behind it and this factor has to be incorporated in any analysis which is seeking comparative analysis.

And yet, despite its amazing achievements with respect to the safeguard of fundamental human rights, of which life is undoubtedly the most important, the U.S. society, executive branch and Congress, have registered and continue to register a dismal failure with respect to gun control.

And you have to understand where I am coming from: I belong to Pakistan which is, after all, known to be one of "the most dangerous places in the world." Every week, one hears news of suicide blasts, ethnic violence and sectarian killings. The writ of the state is extremely weak and in some places, it is virtually non-existent. In short, the state is often not equipped to protect its citizens.

Perhaps, if there is a legitimate case for easy access to guns for ordinary citizens, it is in Pakistan because citizens are in dire need to protect themselves. And yet, in Pakistan, you cannot possess guns with ease. To obtain legal ownership is extremely difficult and, furthermore, gun permits are strictly limited in numbers.

Of course, you can illegally get guns but even there, not everyone has the means or the contacts to obtain these. In Pakistan, unless you are very well-connected or living in a completely wild area, possession of guns is not an easy task.

And moreover, there is no pressure from the general population to ease the restrictions on the gun ownership. Despite the dangers, citizens by and large understand that more guns are not going to protect them. If anything, they understand that possession of guns increase the chance of violence manifold. Gun culture is popular in only those areas which are bordering Afghanistan.

In contrast, the USA, one of the most advanced nations in the world, provides such an easy access to guns that I am literally dumbfounded. And this access is coming at a terrible cost. School shootings [ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/10/school-shootings-since-newtown-_n_5480811.html ] have been on the rise as mentally unfit people find ways to equip themselves with semi-automatic weapons. But what is even more tragic is, generally, the reaction. Instead of coming together with a consensus, the population has become even more polarized.

The pro-gun lobby is actually able to convince a considerable section of the U.S. population that the school shootings occur not because of guns or because of easy access to guns, but because there are not enough guns! One of the most nonsensical spins I have ever heard is that school shootings could be stopped if there were armed people in the schools for countering the attacker.

Resistance to unrestricted gun ownership is projected as "infringement" on the right to bear arms under American constitution. Common sense takes a back seat here as the right to bear arms is often interpreted as right to bear small arms of combat nature by literally anyone.

An advanced democracy with an overall very high level of education and political consciousness seems virtually divided and polarized on an issue where consensus should have been easy given the horrific toil the unrestricted access to guns has brought about.

But while at the popular level, the issue is divisive -- with those vying for greater control in slight majority -- at the political level, the defeat is complete and depressing.

I was in USA when the Newtown, Conn. shooting happened. The entire episode was so depressing and yet the immediate reaction was also uplifting because there appeared to be wide spread condemnation of the act and calls for greater gun control.

And yet, many of the proposals were defeated in April 2013 [ http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/17/senate-to-vote-on-amendments-to-gun-bill-with-background-check-plan-in-doubt/ ]. I was literally astonished because most of the opinion polls had been showing support for better background checks and greater gun control. And yet, in a manner which defied logic, many proposals were defeated. And the ironic part is that those proposals did not -- let me repeat, did not -- infringe upon Second Amendment rights. Controlling the magazine capacity and demanding better background checks would not infringe upon the right to bear arms. These merely balance the right of bearing arms with the constitutional obligation of the state to protect an even more precious right: the right to live.

But ethical considerations aside, why did the proposals get defeated despite apparent public support?

I think that sometimes powerful lobbies are able to take advantage of the representative nature of the American democracy. They were able to do so mainly because in a representative democracy like U.S., a single issue seldom becomes the sole issue. In the interim period between elections, senators can vote against a popular bill and yet get reelected in the elections as voters eventually elect due to party affiliations and an overall assessment. Moreover, in the U.S. Senate, states are equally represented despite enormous population differences and, consequently, some less-populated states are able to affect the policy discourse at the national level in a disproportionate way.

One way to counter is to keep this issue alive and, in fact, at the forefront at the time of next midterm elections. Do not let it eclipse by other issues.

But perhaps President Obama articulated the issue perfectly when he said [ http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/10/us-usa-obama-shootings-idUSKBN0EL2GX20140610 ], "My biggest frustration so far is the fact that this society has not been willing to take some basic steps to keep guns out of the hands of people who can do just unbelievable damage."

As reported by the Associated Press [ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20140610/us-obama-gun-control/ ]:

No developed nation on earth would put up with mass shootings that happen now once a week and disappear from the news within a day, Obama said -- no nation except America.

Let me add something here to make an even stronger point: Not even a developing nation would allow that.

Wake up, America.

Copyright ©2014 TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. (emphasis in original)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/raza-habib-raja/what-i-have-never-gun-control_b_5495370.html [with comments]


--


A-listers in a security panic as gun nut stalks Sanda Bullock

Hollywood stars are beefing-up their security after cops found an illegal machine gun at the home of a deranged fan who was stalking Oscar winner Sandra Bullock.
16th June 2014
The terrified actress (49), was forced to lock herself and her four-year-old adopted son Louis in a bomb and bullet-proof panic room at her Los Angeles mansion after sicko Joshua Corbett broke in last weekend.
Astonishingly, surveillance video has revealed the 39-year-old stalker managed to walk freely around The Blind Side star Sandra’s property for almost an hour before she woke up around 7.30am on Sunday.
Police arrested Corbett when Bullock raised the alarm and a search of his home just 13 miles away revealed a “fully functional machine gun”.
Media analyst Mike Raia said: “I have heard of at least a dozen fellow A-listers who have been so rattled by this they are stepping-up their own security.
“This case has taken stalking to a whole new level. This guy could have wreaked murder and mayhem.”
[...]
http://www.sundayworld.com/entertainment/showbiz/a-listers-in-a-security-panic-as-gun-nut-stalks-sanda-bullock [no comments yet]


--


(linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=90741606 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=100592932 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101148311 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101374546 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101936122 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102001887 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102524360 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102530483 and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102591430 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102762752 and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102959282 and preceding and following,
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102911306 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102934161 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102601505 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102613947 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102632535 and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102956783 and preceding (and any future following),
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102443747 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103015514 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103021106 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103035678 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103085205 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103097817 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103100000 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103135649 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103195956 and preceding (and any future following)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103196151 and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103309543 and preceding (and any future following)