InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,222.68
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
17,650.00
(
0.05%
)
Dow Jones
39,512.84
(
0.32%
)
Brent Oil
82.59
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,285.78
(
0.80%
)
Post# of 67010
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

blue dog

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 23
Posts 1419
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2008

blue dog

Re: 567tbd post# 66757

Tuesday, 04/29/2014 10:32:46 PM

Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:32:46 PM

Post# of 67010
From the discussion of the Hennis proceedings (receiver, etc.), it appears that these were tacked onto the existing Hennis suit that previously went up the state-court appellate chain. So, if you have that case number from prior SEC filings (e.g., I seem to recall that litigation's being discussed here), that would most likely be the case you are looking for.

If that is not enough information, let me know, and I will look for the case. But, I think you just need to go back to the original Hennis case.


I am an amateur at this, and it would be unwise to rely on my opinions without your own independent confirmation in consultation with an investment professional.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up