Adaptive Medias Inc (fka ADTM)

[Irish62]

Why don't you, for ONCE, provide this board with facts to back up your claims? All I ask is for facts and not just your opinion. Are you capable fo that or will it be "ha!.....good one" ?

I've posted previously that I think Onescreen was in trouble due to artificial bots and questionable business practices so we agree to some extent on Onescreen. But Onescreen still has a lot of value and valuable employees who have moved on to ADTM. Combine that with ADTM's fraud squad and legitimacy comes back to Onescreen...that is my opinion based on the FACT that E.J. Hilbert has joined the company as an advisory board member, providing his expertise in combating fraudulent advertising. You see providing FACTS to back up my opinion was not very difficult.

But how was Ember in "trouble"? NOTHING anywhere states that company was in trouble or could not get financing. As a matter of FACT, they had a rather quite impressive "mentor/adviser" with very deep pockets. That adviser is now on advising and investing in ADTM. That adviser gave a thumbs up to the 3 founders of Ember to go with ADTM because it made total sense for the 2 companies to be one. Add in that the 3 and Shareef were very comfortable with each other and it makes even more sense. So you stating Ember was in "trouble" and couldn't get financing is just more of your lies.

And no where has it ever been stated that ADTM couldn't get financing. Shareef made the decision to go the route he has taken and he clearly explained that in yesterdays interview. But am not going to waste time explaining that because you probably didn't even listen to the interview. You prefer to just spout off with ignorant comments and out right lies. You insist that others provide proof but hold yourself to lower standards. Pathetic....and sorry.

As far as Mimvi being an "empty shell", you are again wrong. IMO you do have some credibility in that statement but it is not the classic case of a reverse merger with a "empty shell scam company" as you claim over and over.

Here are a few quotes from the SEC enforcement division of shell companies. Please enlighten me with FACTS and not your opinions on how they relate to ADTM?

"a publicly held company with no or nominal assets other than money"..........

"companies (that were) delinquent in their public filings and appeared to no longer be in business, raising the risk that their securities could be used in pump-and-dump schemes.

In a pump-and-dump scheme, fraudsters will purchase shares of a thinly traded company, tout the firm to investors through false and misleading statements, and sell the stock for significant profit once investors buy in.

"Stock manipulators crave empty shell companies that they can use to conduct pump-and-dump schemes and line their pockets with illicit trading profits by taking advantage of unsuspecting investors," said Andrew J. Ceresney, co-director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "We will aggressively suspend trading in such empty shells to take away a tool of their trade and help rid our markets of fraud".............."there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of [the company] because questions have arisen as to its operating status, if any.”"

ADTM - so what do we have here?

let's see:


1. An Empty shell scam company (MIMV)

2. A company acquired for just $2.5 million in stock that couldn't get financing elsewhere (Adaptive Media)

3. Another company in trouble acquired for just $0.5 million in stock that couldn't get financing elsewhere (Ember)

4. And a fourth company caught involved in defrauding its clients (Onescreen)