InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 12075
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: bim524 post# 384342

Wednesday, 04/23/2014 12:27:12 PM

Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:27:12 PM

Post# of 432573
I will defer to Magilla's sticky;

Apr. 18, 2014 – CAFC 14-1176 (337/800) Case now classified as a confidential case (per phone conversation)

May 22, 2014 - CAFC 14-1176 – IDCC appeal of ITC 337/800 (IDCC’s petition to review, and seeking reversal of the Commission’s FD - Appellee’s (ITC) brief due
(14-1176 is now classified as a confidential case)

• CAFC 14-1419 /337-800 – The ruling from IDCC’s 12/20/2013 filing for review seeking reversal of the Commission’s final determination (using judgments based on the 613 investigation, which were later overturned by the CAFC)


Apr. 14, 2014 – CAFC 14-1419 /337-868 - IDCC files appeal for review of the initial determination terminating the investigation based on the ITC ruling of summary or partial summary judgments) that certain patents were not infringed, based on the 613 FD. (Patents involved are the 970, 406 and the power ramp-up patents)

Sustainable Revenue of AT LEAST $800 million EXPECTED
in 1 to 3 years. I will accept no less. "The Investors's Chief
Problem--and even his worst enemy--is likely to be himself"
---Benjamin Graham

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News