Not to belabor the point, or to cause negativity, but rather in keeping an open mind and information flow-
It begs the question as to the twice announced, not yet delivered PR: Is the PR contingent upon the split being approved and happening? Does this explain the delay in issuing something that was promised 2 weeks ago now?
Here is the necessity for transparency and communication. Without it, investors and shareholders are left to opine for themselves, based upon the meager and sparse data left for them to piece together.
IMO, the 2 are inevitably linked and one explains the other. Again, I could be wrong, but one doesn't promise something (especially publicly, (one on one via email or phone call is completely different scenario) and then fail to deliver. And surely it doesn't happen twice, without a root cause or meaning.
Best.
