Is Kryron real? (or) Better to step back and ask if the Kryron alloys made by John Bourque were created using established, well known and non-proprietary (aka no patents exist or were expired) alloy producing methods, or they were created using our Kryron Process as described under the patents this company has obtained.
Actually that may not be important, as whats important and potentially a very valuable asset this company has in its ownership are the patents that describe the Kryron Process, as these may allow success for this company to happen.
This company at near zero cost and in a near zero time frame can get its head out from where the sun don't shine and do what was needed long ago, and that was not producing Kryron alloys for demos and tests, but to have an independent lab skilled in the material sciences with the help of persons skilled in alloy creation to use the Kryron patents and produce alloys that can have their internal structure examined to determine if this Kryron Process does indeed do as described, as follows.
"The Kryronization process creates Carbon Nanotube Metal Matrix Composites (CNT-MMC) using standard alloys and base metals. The Kryronization process solved the problems of providing a reliable and cost-effective process for the uniform dispersion of carbon nanotubes in metal. The resulting CNT-MMC materials have enhanced qualities in terms of heat dissipation, electrical conductivity, hardness and resistance to corrosion."
To be clear, the "cost so much to make that it is not marketable" is not an issue to be determined, but using any low cost "powder/dust" in the process will suitable since the resulting alloy is not slated for any commercial application, but only to be identified if the Kryron Process (the patents) creates alloys as described above, for if they do and existing alloy producing methods do not, they we do indeed have made a better mouse trap.
The business model I have proposed in past posts for a successful Bourque Industries is not one where we create Kryron alloys, but one where we issue licenses to other companies that allows them to create their own powder/dust to create Kryron alloys from usage of the Kryron patents. This removes from Bourque Industries the need of cash to test and market Kryron alloys, for that cost and time will be attached to any company creating Kryron alloys, with a license, to determine if what they have is marketable.
Most likely only a very few Kryron alloys produces will have any properties suitable for usage in products, and of these that do, the cost mixture and research and development and testing and manufacturing will be on those companies issued a license. For those companies successful Bourque Industries will simply sit back, relax and receive royalty payments as BORK's pps will climb upwards as Kryron alloy success will generate interest from other companies as they obtains a license and make their own proprietary powder/dust used in the Kryron Process.
Once again, this company needs to identify if the Kryron Process (patents) create a alloy with the internal structure described by this company, for that will determine if this company is a fraud or a once in a lifetime opportunity to invest in.
Forget and disregard all past and current Kryron alloy claims, as they are worthless in the focus of marketability to make this company a success, as we need to know if a Kryron alloy is unique and unequaled in existing alloy processes to create internal structure that have the potential to generate advanced properties of an alloy.
Doug
AI
