If your going to post these assumptions of yours I would like to know what reliable proof source you are using to backup what you say when you state this: "For those who have not understood this: the recent decline in SP is mainly due to the fact that the figures have shown that Martha Stewart is proven not to be the cash cow she was supposed to be. So it's gonna take some more capital to grow this company. That's not a blame for anyone involved. It's just a fact. And yes, I do believe the management is doing the right thing in this regard."
How is it that you are the expert to claim that the Martha Stewart Essentials are not selling as expected and that this is the reason for the pps decline? Because during my conversation with the CEO that is not at all the case! Did you simply forget about the fact that PriceSmart has taken on the MSE? The Martha Stewart brand is not even a year old and already you have surmised it will not be the cash cow that YOU expected! Don't make assumptions for everyone, as I always believed and still do, that the Martha Stewart Essentials will be a big success for the company, but it takes time. NRTI plans on adding a lot more new distribution and this brand is just getting started.
The Martha Stewart brand is not responsible for this pullback! Where do you come up with this crap? The pullback is due to a couple major reasons, which is due to the volatile market in general and the fact that the entire cannabis segment came under huge selling pressure. Is TRTC selling Martha Stewart Essentials? NO! If you were in tune to what was really happening, you might have a clue what is really going on. Frankly I think you are out in left field somewhere.
Your continual post about these capital issues are a joke imo. How many times have you posted about the company having to diluting to raise funds? Yet, every quarter you are proven wrong! Mr. James made it very clear that the use of dilution is something he will avoid at all cost. He has went out and secured huge anti-dilutive funding for the company in the form of grants and yet you never even comment on that, but instead all you post about every quarter is whether or not the company sold shares to raise funds. Yet every quarter, despite what the CEO said to refute your dilution theory, you go ahead and post about it anyway, raising questions in new investors minds.
I have repeatedly told you that the CEO would gladly speak to you about it, to put it to rest once and for all, but you always refuse. Now here you are again bringing up the issue and making assumptions about Martha Stewart Essentials sales and what it will mean for the company. Yet you still refrain from calling the CEO to get the real facts.
This has led to one simple conclusion, you are either an idiot or you are really shorting the stock. Your incessant behavior of repeating the same issues over and over, despite the facts that prove you wrong, along with the fact that you refuse to call the CEO to put an end to your repeated worrying post, has led to this conclusion. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense for you to post these concerns of yours over and over without taking up the CEO's offer of speaking to you directly. Who would own a stock and repeatedly post these unfounded concerns without taking up the CEO's offer to speak with you about it so you could hear the facts straight from his mouth. Something is not right here and it doesn't make sense, so you go ahead and keep posting your crap, but I will be there with the facts to prove your true intent.
To prove my conclusion wrong you will need to actually call the CEO to get the truth that debunks all your concerned assumptions or stop posting this BS.
Cheers!
.PNG)
.PNG)
