InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 2567
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/20/2008

Re: djcat post# 398181

Tuesday, 04/15/2014 11:30:01 AM

Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:30:01 AM

Post# of 734459
What is this? The 'shoulda' 'woulda' 'coulda' post?
If you are trying to say that because we didn't trade this properly over the years then we missed out on a 'fair and reasonable' settlement that we could have had?
And you arrived at this conclusion using 20/20 hindsight, not the foresight of any investor that actually invested in the way that you outlined. This is not constructive looking back, the kind you can use to solve this current situation. And I dare to say that very few were even in this in 2007. If I remember right WM was around $9 when I was in it in 2008. It went down to .0001 rapidly that day. I was left with a handful of 'Q" stocks; I didn't know what they were, but I read up in the court case and then brought much more.
When WAMPQ was $100 I guess I was greedy and also I was reading that it was worth a lot more. I guess I've always been a 'Q' stock junky. It was a difficult time to be able to see ahead and do the right thing. Then came the famous March, 2008 day when everything just crashed, in an orchestrated way.
So I am where I am now. At least I had the foresight to double up on WMIH at .45 and maybe that plus my escrow shares will ultimately yield me a 'fair and reasonable' settlement. But looking back with 20/20 hindsight is closely related to 'I told you so.' IMO


'HAD-- $900,000 in 2007'
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News