Followers | 20 |
Posts | 1132 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/11/2011 |
Friday, April 11, 2014 10:22:26 AM
I believe Susman Godfrey http://www.susmangodfrey.com/Types-of-Cases/Intellectual-Property/Representative-Patent-Cases/ agreed to move forward because they can use refiling as leverage in settlement without having to restart the clock. Also remember, they are covering their own costs here and get paid only when WDDD wins.
In a nutshell, Casper did nothing to WDDD with her SJ ruling except possibly give incentive to both sides to settle... kind of a warning shot... I still am very confident in WDDD getting at least a partial payout from the 'temporarily lost patent years' on top of the cleared patent years and treble damages by a company that WDDD had offered a licensing deal to...
Recent WDDD News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/19/2023 09:30:21 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/11/2023 06:34:14 PM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM