There are subjective and objective opinions.
There is subjective and objective analysis of DD.
Which you prefer depends on your agenda and goal.
Truth or manipulation.
The subjective analysis will cherry pick the DD and promote that which helps their agenda. If DD is good it will be promoted loudly and often. If negative it will be suppressed. Anyone showing the negative will be a basher or short.
The subjective would take news that says
"we bought property at a discount and it should give us 100% profit in a year or two" And they would then project that to mean the pps will go up 100%.
The objective view would look at that and weigh it against the whole financial picture. We know the devil is in the details. Details like AS/OS ratio, debt, dilution, funding etc. If company has large debt and the AS almost maxed out and the results of shares already in the market have little value to show then all that needs be included in the evaluation of any new news. If done objectively it may shows that the 100% profit projected may only impact the pps by a few % that is if the whole picture is analyzed. And where the subjective one will say "this news is huge" the objective one will say "good news yes but not huge news".
I have seen many pennystock plays that if you focus only on the good news you will be burnt in the long run. Even when you evaluate all the info the deck is stacked against us. Since much info that is needed is not made available. The devil is in the details. Usually only the positive details are stressed.
I think PRDL has a good chance to succeed. But it will take time. They having a rough start financially. We are not ready for a to the moon scenario that can hold it gains yet IMO. But long term it if gets though this beginning could be decent company.
It is easy to figure out what you believe. The difficulty lies in determining - is what you believe the truth.
