InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 267
Posts 13095
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/29/2003

Re: 1971 post# 26966

Thursday, 04/10/2014 11:12:24 PM

Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:12:24 PM

Post# of 79304
All info is out there? Well if it is would you direct me to it? I must have missed it somewhere during my 6 hrs. of searching for pertinent info on Lockwood revenues, contracts and the lawsuit. Perhaps you don't understand the litigation that is going on. Lockwood and Daedalus are suing and are plaintiffs, not defendants. Thereby, any earnings by Lockwood would not be subject to being "tied up". And there would be legal fees in the financial filings if that were the case. The legal fees are most likely on a contingency basis and/or are a part of the damages that will be awarded if Lockwood/Daedalus are successful in getting a judgment. And of course Sam is confident of a positive outcome. Would he say otherwise?

So again, if you have information that would verify your premise that revenues by Lockwood are "tied up", please share a link that is "out there".

Seems kind of curious that Sam can sell 20% of his Lockwood holdings for $1 to FWDG, if everything Lockwood has is tied up in the lawsuit. Don't you think?

As far as I can tell from the PR's and Share Holder updates, Lockwood (Verecis) is still doing business and supposedly generating revenue.