Monday, April 28, 2008 1:16:05 PM
Through Rio Tinto's project, Guinea will be getting over $5bn in new infrastructure plus billions more in taxes and royalties over the next few decades, of which a fixed percentage is specifically required to go to local communities. It will actually happen too, as opposed to the smoke and mirrors being promised by UMNG, and it will be developed by a listed international group that is required to comply with proper environmental standards and business practices. IFC also owns 5% of the project, to help keep them honest and ensure they don't just pillage the country for profit. Where are the quality/transparency safeguards with an unlisted company trading on the pink sheets with no finance and no major project experience in any country, let alone West Africa!
I agree that Guinea needs infrastructure development to make full use of its resources, but who is better placed to provide them with that infrastructure?
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM