InterDigital Inc (IDCC): That is an absolute gross misrepresentat...

Reply Private New

Replies (6) Next 10 Prev Next

Send PM Follow Ignore

Followers	13
Posts	305
Boards Moderated	0
Alias Born	01/12/2006

JD GATOR

Re: frobinso post# 217033

Friday, 04/18/2008 4:55:20 PM

Friday, April 18, 2008 4:55:20 PM

That is an absolute gross misrepresentation of the comments by the CCA. Nowhere can one glean that IDCC lawyers laid down on the job from that statement. We do not know what HARM IDCC lawyers espoused to the panel that would be inflicted upon IDCC in the event of the so-called "modest delay." For all we know, they laid out everything everyone's been crying about since the decision. The panel simply did not buy it, or chose to ignore it. Bottom line is: that's the nature of our judiciary. Gonna win cases you should lose, and lose some you should win. The CCA in this case, right or wrong, decided that the delay is not IRREPARABLE. Even if harm is SUBSTANTIAL, as Loop so eloquently explained, it is IRREPARABLE that is the key in this decision. The two terms are not synonomous. Come on guys! Lay off the lawyers. Look at their track record for other clients and tell me they are slouches. Read the motion to sever again and tell me they don't know their case. We are given only bits and pieces of facts and testimony. The rest is either redacted or sealed. Pretty tough (IMHO) to make a judgemnt as to the quality of our legal team based on less than the whole story. Everyone needs to lighten up and let this thing play out. What's it gonna be? IDCC lawyers suck, or there is a political conspiracy? If we were still trading at $36/share, I wonder if our lawyers would still suck.

BTW: I am an attorney and long since 1998, and not going anywhere til bankruptcy or vindication.