InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1455
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/26/2006

Re: Badge714 post# 28506

Friday, 01/04/2008 2:59:54 PM

Friday, January 04, 2008 2:59:54 PM

Post# of 51429
Badge, your biggest problem right now is that for whatever reason you have gone so far to the other side that you can no longer even see any positives. It seems everything that happens with Hemi is an automatic negative. I've only had a chance to read lately (and only some of the posts) and not do much posting but it seems everything I read from you, you view from only one angle.

Let us take for example your posts from the other day about the pinksheet.com rating. You went on and on and on about Keith not being on top of his game and about not knowing the rules and this makes one question his credibility (#28402). You then seem to compare getting this rating from pinksheets.com as a doctor who continues his education and goes to seminars (#28419). Come on now, Badge. That is a very poor analogy. This pinksheets.com rating appears to me to be nothing more than a money making scheme setup by a private company (pinksheets.com). While lately I have only had a few minutes each day on the computer, you seem to be able to be on the computer all the time... try doing some DD on the pinksheets.com rating. I did this a while back and came to the conclusion that it was nothing more than a money making gimmick for pinksheets.com... an attempt to try and force pink sheet companies to PAY UP or be labeled with a big ass negative rating on their site. Read some of my posts about this before it was even implemented and you'll see some basic information I found about this "program" and my opinions on it.

I just looked at the 20 most active forums here and at their ratings. Of the pink sheet companies, ONE had current information. ONE!!!!! Only four even had limited information. The rest of the pink sheet companies were in the same boat or worse (grey market or skull & cross bones) than Hemi.

Now that you've given your assumptions on what all this means (Keith doesn't know the rules, shows his credibility should be questioned) I'll give you mine. Instead of immediately jumping to the negative, I'll think this through and think what could be the reason. In fact, I think Keith made a mistake by even participating in this crap program to begin with! This pinksheets.com program to me is nothing more than the mob coming into a deli owner's store and demanding weekly protection money or additional "rent" money because they setup shop in "their" neighborhood. Do your own DD on this program, Badge, and let me know what you think about it. Anyway, I'll make the assumption that Keith didn't do the necessary research into this "high cost subscription service" initially and just filed to appease the shareholders. Now, during the last six months, he has looked into the program and may have come to the same conclusions I have and has decided to not continue to waste money on it... and for good reason IMO. Just think about it. You've got the greys, pinks, OTCBB, then big board. That is the order but now all of a sudden somebody wants to make more money and throw another layer into this mix between the pinks and OTCBB and at the same time charge decent amounts of money and fees for it!!! What a load of crap. When a company is ready to start spending funds on reporting and extra lawyers and all that crap they uplist to the OTCBB. Why even bother with starting out as a pink sheet company if investors think you must file also with pinksheets.com to be considered legit? But, I digress... do your own DD into this and you'll likely come to a similar conclusion that this pinksheets.com reporting extra bullchit layer is nothing more than an additional way and attempt by pinksheets.com to make a boatload more money. And, if you come to the conclusion that this is still a fantabulous idea then I'm going to immediately start up a program/company where you can be my first customer and so long as you pay me $100 a month and provide me your monthly medical records and updated personal police reports (an extra expense to you) I won't run an ad in your local paper with your name, picture, address, etc. with a big stop sign next to your picture indicating you *might* have HIV and be a child molester. Heck, you haven't provided me with the information indicating you have a clean bill of health and a good person so I must warn people I have no information about you and that you might have HIV and be a child molester! SUCKS being strong armed into paying for something you shouldn't need to pay for to begin with doesn't it??? That's basically my point. And, just kidding about the above so don't worry about sending me the $100 :)

Sorry for the long post but just wanted to point out that for most all your negative opinions and assumptions I can likely say something about the same thing that is completely opposite of your opinion.

Also, Keith might file with pinksheets.com tomorrow... I have no idea. I just used this as an example. However, I still won't care if Keith decides to not continue to line pinksheets.com's pockets with cash. I'm not a herd follower and while I'm not going to argue that most investors will probably see a stop sign as a negative, I will aruge that most investors have NO CLUE what this program is all about.

Take care... got to get back to work.

FWIW and those wondering, I have more shares right now than I've ever had (bought more last week) and so do my friends and family. Just because I haven't been able to post as much doesn't mean I'm not still buying more :)






Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.