Zinvestorjac, with these WRNW thoughts...
Please, before you begin reading any of my thoughts, please understand that I am simply killing brain cells while trying to figure out what exactly is happening (or close enough).
By all means anything I say is not to be considered the gospel. I would like for you or any anyone else to share your thoughts to bring me back to earth if some of my thoughts go out to another planet.
** I think with the legal issues that existed with WRNW, they had to co-exist through another company. This is how you get around the legal issues. Imagine WRNW closing the Team and Cementers deal, then selling the assets to DVFI again as like the previous deal, and then simply giving WRNW shareholders a 1 for 1 spin-off.
** With the WRNW OS being 800 million, WRNW must have at least a 51% controlling interest. That would mean that WRNW has 800,000,000 x .51 = 408,000,000 shares. This means that us retail investors would make up the remainder equating to 800,000,000 - 408,000,000 = 392,000,000 shares.
** This means that they could add/account for the 392,000,000 shares of us retail WRNW investors by way of a 1 for 1 spin-off of DVFI and would take the DVFI OS up to the appropriate amount of 392,000,000 + 383,853,101 (DVFI OS) = 775,853,101 shares.
** They could implement a "poison pill" type of creating of preferred shared to make sure they always maintain a controlling interest, but through preferred shares instead so that the OS won't get increased to dilute the fundamental valuation to determine its actual worth.
** What I think could be happening is... yep... some of you might have guessed it already as this term is not new to some... but... Parallel Valuation (PV). This is simply when a parallel valuation is established from one stock due to its relation in another particular stock.
** See PV like this... With a much lower Float and OS with DVFI, it would not take much for the price of DVFI to increase. If a 1 for 1 spin-off were to be given, if DVFI is at .01 per share, then WRNW will be worth .01 per share. Another way to see it would be to think that if you had to buy shares to get its stock to .05 to .10 per share, which stock would be the easiest for doing such; DVFI or WRNW? Probably DVFI because of the Float being much lower.
** This means too that DVFI would increase valuation into the newly transformed WRNW shell to where it would better put the WRNW in a much better position to leverage a lower amount of shares at a much higher price to resolve some of the issues that forced WRNW to transition all assets into DVFI.
(Too tired to proofread the above.)
v/r
Sterling
