I watched the Hoboken video and the 5 part september series and I need to watch both again several times before I comment.
I won't go into details about my profession but I wil lsay that I am an engineer and have designed steel structures, I am fully aware of the properties of steel (and concrete). I know what happens to steel when it melts, and when it is stressed beyong it's yield point. What I can say is that some of the points made in the Hoboken video are not correct.
However, saying that, I am blown away (no pun) regarding the squibs, flashes, debris trajectories, kinetic energy and all of the other arguments.
Regarding the arguments about "probability" I do also see some holes in the argument. One should never argue that the "probability" of simultaneous squibs is unlikely and thus must have been man-made. This is a fasle asssumption. The TIMING of the squibs and the sequence do not prove detonations. The FLASH (heat) does.
Anyway, I need to watch more and review my engineering books before I comment in any more detail.
This is fascinating. I'm looking forward to adding some scientific rigor.
![](//i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb30/evilwizzard/MEANDMYBROTHER.jpg)