InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,509.01
(
0.62%
)
US TECH 100
19,471.20
(
1.01%
)
Dow Jones
39,331.85
(
0.41%
)
Brent Oil
86.45
(
-0.10%
)
Bitcoin
61,951.16
(
-1.43%
)
Post# of 482496
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

F6

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 59
Posts 34538
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/02/2003

F6

Re: rooster post# 44455

Monday, 02/12/2007 10:22:28 AM

Monday, February 12, 2007 10:22:28 AM

Post# of 482496
Cosmic Rays Are Not the Cause of Climate Change, Scientists Say

American Geophysical Union NEWS
21 January 2004
AGU Release No. 04-05
For Immediate Release
Contact: Harvey Leifert
+1 (202) 777-7507
hleifert@agu.org

WASHINGTON - Eleven Earth and space scientists say that a recent paper attributing most climate change on Earth to cosmic rays is incorrect and based on questionable methodology. Writing in the January 27 issue of Eos, published by the American Geophysical Union, Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and colleagues in Canada, France, Germany, Switzerland, and the United States challenge the cosmic ray hypothesis.

In July 2003, astrophysicist Nir Shaviv and geologist Jan Veizer wrote in GSA Today that they had established a correlation between cosmic rays and temperature evolution over hundreds of millions of years. They also claimed that current global warming is not primarily caused by human emissions of carbon dioxide. Their findings have been widely reported in international news media.

According to Rahmstorf, Shaviv and Veizer's analyses--and especially their conclusions--are scientifically ill-founded. The data on cosmic rays and temperature so far in the past are extremely uncertain, he says. Further, their reconstruction of ancient cosmic rays is based on only 50 meteorites, and most other experts interpret their significance in a very different way, he says. He adds that two curves presented in the article show an apparent statistical correlation only because the authors adjusted the data, in one case by 40 million years. In short, say the authors of the Eos article, Shaviv and Veizer have not shown that there is any correlation between cosmic rays and climate.

As for the influence of carbon dioxide in climate change, many climatologists were surprised by Shaviv and Veizer's claim that their results disproved that current global warming was caused by human emissions, Rahmstorf says. Even if their analysis were methodologically correct, their work applied to time scales of several million years.

The current climate warming has, however, occurred during just a hundred years, for which completely different mechanisms are relevant, he says. For example, over millions of years, the shifting of continents influences climate, while over hundreds of thousands of years, small changes in Earth's orbit can initiate or terminate ice ages. But for time periods of years, decades, or centuries, these processes are irrelevant. Volcanic eruptions, changes in solar activity, and the concentration of greenhouse gases, as well as internal oscillations of the climate system, are crucial on this scale.

The 11 authors of the Eos article affirm that the strong increase of carbon dioxide and some other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere due to manmade emissions is most probably the main cause of the global warming of the last few decades. The most important physical processes are well understood, they say, and model calculations as well as data analyses both come to the conclusion that the human contribution to the global warming of the 20th century was dominant.

**********

Notes for journalists:

Journalists (only) may obtain an advance pdf copy of this paper upon request to Kara LeBeau: klebeau@agu.org.
Please provide your name, name of publication, phone, and email address. The paper and this press release are not under embargo.

Title: "Cosmic Rays, Carbon Dioxide, and Climate"

Citation: Rahmstorf, S. et al., Cosmic rays, carbon dioxide, and climate, Eos, Trans. AGU, 85(4), 38, 41, 2004.

Contact information for the authors:

Stefan Rahmstorf, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam University, Potsdam, Germany: rahmstorf@pik-potsdam.de or +49-331-288-2688

David Archer, Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA: d-archer@uchicago.edu or +1 773-702-0823

Denton S. Ebel, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA: Contact through Robin Lloyd, AMNH Communications Office: lloyd@amnh.org or +1 212-496-3419

Otto Eugster, Department of Space Research and Planetology, Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland: otto.eugster@phim.unibe.ch or +41 31-6314418

Jean Jouzel, Director, Pierre Simon Laplace Institute, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France: jouzel@lsce.saclay.cea.fr +33 684759682

Douglas Maraun, Institute of Physics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany: maraun@agnld.uni-potsdam.de or +49 331-977-1364

Urs Neu, ProClim-, Swiss Forum for Climate and Global Change, Swiss Academy of Sciences, Bern, Switzerland: neu@sanw.unibe.chor +41 31-328-23-26

Gavin A. Schmidt, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research, New York, New York, USA: gschmidt@giss.nasa.gov or +1 212-678-5627

Jeffrey P. Severinghaus, Geoscience Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, USA: jseveringhaus@ucsd.edu or +1 858-822-2483

Andrew J. Weaver, School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: weaver@uvic.ca or +1 250-472-4001

Jim Zachos, Director, Center for the study of the Dynamics and Evolution of the Land-Sea Interface, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA: jzachos@emerald.ucsc.edu or +1 831-459-4644

###

http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/prrl/prrl0405.html


Greensburg, KS - 5/4/07

"Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty."
from John Philpot Curran, Speech
upon the Right of Election, 1790

F6

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up