InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 4198
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/2006

Re: None

Thursday, 02/08/2007 12:46:45 AM

Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:46:45 AM

Post# of 549
Why did Clinton link Al Qaeda and Iraq in 1998

if the liberals are continually telling us that Iraq had no affiliation with terrorism when we "invaded" the country?

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040624-112921-3401r.htm
>>>>>

Clinton first linked al Qaeda to Saddam


The 1998 indictment said: "Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq."
>>>>>>

But wait, this statement wasn't made by Bush! It was made by a democrat in 1998! Bush wasn't even in office, so how he could manipulate this intelligence? But..but...liberals contend that Bush made this link up to invade Iraq!

Can we get a liberal to explain how Bush manipulated 1998 intelligence?

Are liberals lying for opportunistic reasons? Do they forget history? Why do liberals continue to embolden the enemy by spreading lies and venom?


Also:
Examples of sick liberal opportunists:
http://www.husseinandterror.com/

Misc:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=5951&R=C6811940A








Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.