Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
As usual, drugman gets pretty much everything wrong.
Squires got you a contract with India.- authentic services - Maybe. We never saw it, so there is no way to evaluate if it would create value. If squires couldn't make profitable QD's, how was India going to pull it off?
Squires sold 2 Q Dots machines two India actual goods - "sold" is generous. Is there any evidence they were paid for? 1 maybe. Why were they never used? As noted many time in these pages, they could have been set up in any building.
Squires got QMC HealthID in to Innova's app authentic services actual goods - there is no evidence of this actually happening commercially.
Squires got a 20 million dollar contract with Pasaca.genuine value - it was a debt financing - not a contract.
Here you go Drugman - looks like QMC is/has suing Pasaca for $14.2M for breach of contract.
https://stocktwits.com/Bulldog_Retired/message/580284405
It's a WIX template. From the HTML:
meta name="generator" content="Wix.com Website Builder"
I'm doubtful that Pasaca ever invested any money.
Art, the gay Canadian bros, QDR, and all the other sycophants are tellingly quiet - for years now. What did they know, and when did they know it?
More background. "In possession" means the shareholders will all be wiped out.
That's not what I asked.
Multiple times, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, you clung to the belief that an investment was made and posted such.
Do you still believe an investment was made by Pasaca?
Do you still believe that Pasaca invested in QMC?
It would be amazing too given that is coming from someone who has either lied or been wrong about literally everything he has ever posted on this stock.
This is how backwards QMC bootlicking has become - the stock's apologist argues that once you get a product, you're done with quality assurance. You can't make this stuff up.
LAMO just doesn't even begin to describe this guy's posts anymore.
If they have any payroll in TX, they have to be registered in TX. It could be the things you mentioned. It could also be that they want to sue someone - maybe Lawson for yanking the license out from under them?
And the crickets just get louder with each passing day.
Queue up drugman to tell us that he called in and they told him that Pasaca has them sharing space in innova's labs...
They have been working on that tech since 2014. As far as I know, they have never disclosed any efficiency numbers nor proven they can do high speed production.
Weak and gay soy boy rodman is to cowardly to respond to me in public, so now he sends me crybaby private messages.
LMAO+++
But QMC hasn't announced their deal with Lawson is dead, so it must still be alive right? That's the argument you've made for literally EVERY other QMC announcement that has gone nowhere.
Logical inferences stemming from the 2024 QMCH fundraising teaser -
1) K&L Lawsuit settlement provided little or no capital
2) Pasaca deal is dead
3) QMC longs are getting diluted on QMCH value by Squires raising money into QMCH rather than QMC.
4) An S-1 filing more likely to be for QMCH and not QMC
Bag - meet holder,
https://www.linkedin.com/in/s-bradley-squires-b577892aa/overlay/1705438855680/single-media-viewer/?profileId=ACoAAEqCfzMBIJODE806JCkj7YVoCWaidFD43Iw
With this stock, (a) common sense and (b) wishful thinking based predictions both have perfect rack records. Perfect success and perfect failure respectively.
Mr. word games will be proven wrong yet again, and I will be proven right yet again.
Drugman makes unsupportable assertions and then when called out on it, all he has to offer is that his assertions were called assumptions. That's called being disingenuous. That's all you need to know about drugman. Disingenuous.
Why drugman's assumptions and positive spin are likely wrong (reposted from the other site):
Yes, [QMCH] is a sub of QMC. None of [drugman's] assumptions are necessarily true however.
The value of the sub may or may not add value to the parent. Depends on the capital structure. As I have previously speculated, we now have a tangible reason to believe that they have been raising money by selling QMCH equity. That would dilute QMC's ownership of QMCH. For all we know, QMC only owns a tiny piece of QMCH now. For that matter, it's possible that QMCH preferred has claim on all the value of QMCH.
If QMCH ends up generating value and that value goes to QMCH shareholders, maybe only a little or none goes to QMC - so yes, raising money into QMCH rather than QMC might be hugely dilutive to QMC longs despite QMCH creating value. QMC would likely sell QD to QMCH or license the technology, but how much could they need? The demand would likely be miniscule compared to uses in things like TVs or lighting which seem completely dead.
More importantly, if they have been raising money into QMCH as the PowerPoint I linked to suggests, there would be nothing to stop them from registering QMCH shares but not QMC shares We may see an S-1, but it may be for QMCH - not QMC. Wouldn't that be a kick in the teeth.
If they do that, maybe they later reverse merge QMC into QMCH, we'd likely be diluted into oblivion, but maybe would could sell something.
PV's complete disappearance from the boards might be the best evidence of QMC's demise, and if not demise, the total dilution of the longs.
You got to love it when the guy who literally has never been right about anything related to this stock calls other people idiots.
Classic projection.
LMAO+++
Let this be a lesson to you shoondale. The guy who always takes the broadest possible reading - beyond any possible reality in most cases - is schooling you on how to read carefully.
LMAO+++
How dumb or dishonest do you have to still be pretending there is a relationship between QMC and Pasaca...
LMAO+++
Maybe we have lost our money already - if QMC has been raising money by selling QMC-Health - diluting the QMC longs in the process - maybe we're already screwed even if the company is successful. Maybe that's why there has been no update???
.
A 3 year old 8-K suggests they are a part of Pasaca when Pasaca has scrubbed all references to QMC from their website?
LOL x2
Give a nice piece of real estate a chance?
LMAO+++
Rod, you seem like someone who gets a CBD rubdown before rolling up your sleeve for your 8th COVID booster - or are you on your 10th booster now? I bet you still wear a mask too.
In all fairness, you can't be expected to be a high-tech CEO and not live in at least a 7,200sf mansion on a 14ac estate. In some ways, he is kind of slumming it by comparison.
"Amber"
LMAO.