Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Moderna maybe, but Gilead didn't double anything. C'mon now.
APA, that's a different story :)
Stock that is a scam and won't make a profit in the next 10 years yet here we sit talking about it...hmmmm
MXSG up 45% today...next!
Man I'm impressed.
SEC specialist
Mining Specialist
Stylometry specialist
Wish MXSG would hire you, dang now that would be GOLDEN!
"I am sure I am not the only one that would like this resolved. It's a publicly traded company, how about some transparency?"
I was just hired as a consultant for a publicly traded company. Please let me know where I can find it published of exactly what my responsibilities are and the way I'm paid. I'll wait patiently, want to see if it's accurate LOL!!!
LOL...it's only important to determine if it's criminal or not LMAO...gee, can't imagine why he keeps using that word. Every implication and question you have around the whole topic is to determine if it's CRIMINAL.
Pretty sure why would someone who doesn't care how they get paid, do research to find out? If it's illegal, don't worry the good ol' SEC will let us know. If the SEC doesn't have a problem with it, well then....
News.....PR's don't cost money for ink, only people buying ink is the ones printing them. You're welcome!
"What are the chances we never hear another word about the drill results? LOL, I would say pretty high given Mexus’s history."
Well....
Completely agree.
I don't discount the complaints people have made about MXSG and how they have done things in the past. Definitely reason to have concern.
However, say what you want MXSG has made GREAT strides to change the ways. After MarMar fiasco, they started a drill program, have released results, trying to give a reasonable next steps plan. One would say they have achieved more and been more above board in the last 6 months than they have the last 6 years. But others won't change the tune at all, and even acknowledge it. Things are going significantly better from a process stand point, so just try to post gibberish and speak of the past. Definitely gets old.
LMAO...keep running with your delay theory. It's comical at this point how many times you are proven wrong. Keep at it though, gives me a chuckle.
Wow loan paid off, results are out, phase 2 plan moving forward.
I've been here longer than most, have a nice chunk of shares but nowhere near the top. I didn't receive those if it makes you feel better :)
Yeah it's clear some see glass half full and some half empty. Then you have a select few that see the empty glass and as you add water right in front of their eyes they claim to still see nothing.
Hate to rain on the parade but it would actually be drop, drop, drop, go up, go up...
Maybe results are good enough they want to make sure to take full advantage of PR...just saying!
Duh, he was referencing another person's point only being speculation.
And again asking because I really don't know...
Exhibit 99.1
1. We note your disclosure of bulk tonnage estimates in your exhibit 99.1 with respect to
your Santa Elena property. Only proven and probable reserves may be disclosed in
filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Instructions to Item 102 of Regulation S-K. Please revise to remove the bulk tonnage
estimates.
Clearly states only proven and probable reserves may be disclosed in filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the instructions to item 102 of regulation S-K.
Have they put the bulk tonnage numbers in any filings that is addressed above since then?
If they were told to stop doing something in 2016, and since have not received a letter or questioned on continuous communiciation...
Your story doesn't change, mine doesn't either. SEC over 2 years ago said change the way you are doing something, and not a word since. Is that what your saying?
Oh that's right you don't like the way they calculate numbers, complete and utterly illegal per the SEC. That's what makes it false, I forgot. Dang SEC, can't believe they haven't done anything. The nerve of some of these agencies, crazy!
Nope, sorry I don't live in that world. Berk was brought in on 1/7, if you disagree then you must prove it as I have a PR that is dated 1/7 saying so. Anything prior to 1/7 in terms of a PR would not qualify for step 2 thus making you both wrong....good try though, back to the drawing board.
YOUR WORDS, not mine:
"Step 1) Mexus hires hype team. Step 2) Mexus releases outlandish PR. Step 3) Mexus hype team goes to work. Step 4) Mexus hype team and Mexus team hope for new investors to buy or Mexus longs to buy more (aka the pump). Step 5) The dump"
In order for any of this happen, step 1 must happen. So you are saying MXSG hires a hype team. So step 2 must happen AFTER step 1 (I know big numbers are hard at times to comprehend) so you state a hype team was hired, please provide outlandish PR after said team was hired. Make sure to provide dates, I'll wait.
LOL, MIC drop.
Please show dates of step 1 confirmed, and the date of step 2 being after step 1, I'll wait...
Did they release an "outlandish" PR? So I guess it's not the process you speak of eh?
Hugs?
People don't work for free? Tell me it ain't so!
Hopefully quickly.
If a company violates a regulation, then I got to believe said agency would impose fines or shut it down. I missed that PR, please advise where the SEC has done anything but a warning on content a few years back.
Lets look at the gibberish of others around these necks of the woods who was contacting SEC directly and filing a complaint. Whatever came of that again. I'll wait.
Nope didn't know that because I don't work nor do I represent entities that are governed by the SEC. I personally choose not to try to speak for an authority agency as if it's fact, when I have no right doing so. But that's just me!
No technicality needed. Yes you were wrong.
Guide 42
No, but you nor I work for the SEC so to speak as if you do is silly. If the SEC hasn't said it, don't speak for them as if it's fact.
SEC has not fined, or shut down anything so until that happens I don't give two craps about your "SEC" nonsense. In one comment you slam the guy because banned and fined by SEC, but SEC hasn't done crap with MXSG but you keep bringing them up. Love seeing the squirm from some, knowing MXSG still sitting here when ya'll Nostradamus fail wannabe's!!! Throw enough crap against the wall, something eventually sticks right?
It would make sense if it was dialogue with content. But there is no content in the dialogue.
MXSG Sucks
No They Don't
Yes they do
Why did they say this
Remember 4 years ago when they did this
Why is there a delay, even though there is no delay
Again, if there was actual dialogue it would be one thing. But these conversations are Trump vs Pelosi everyday!
Even when a person gives you their reason or validity for their thoughts, you minimize it by telling them their thinking is wrong LOL!
It wouldn't be a penny stock if it was anything other than speculation, so to answer your question yes.
Why do you guys care so much what message board poster thinks?
Pretty much sums it up for those who can read...good call out Dutch!
fake news again...
ok so this is how it works, please show me where it's been said by me several times today. I'll wait.
The lab can be backed up, wow so your saying it's possible the news isn't bad and MXSG isn't intentionally withholding results...interesting.
I thought we needed a PR for every item, including when the workers took breaks to account for the extra 15 minutes, and what type of burrito they had for lunch...I'm confused now. Not enough info, now too much? Yep, Circle-**** sounds like some of the rhetoric by others.
Yes it did, got you talking didn't it?
There you go with the D word again, and you said you weren't going to use.
LOL...ya'll been saying that for years. Obviously by PT saying imminent a time frame was created by it. So I will say you are wrong again.