Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sing it with me
… Capitulation, Capitula..a…tion
…It’s making you wait…
What a TURD !
Who’s the phucktard so desperate to sell 15’s ?
OTC traders are scum
Now can I ?
Not attempting to be negative however this was inevitable.
OTC people always weed themselves out considering vast majority have no patients / scruples.
Most would dump on their mother for $$
What’a POS
OTC Cess Pool
OTC will always be a Cess Pool
Ignorant & d!ck head traders will are sure of that.
Good to see still bid whacking douche waffles playin’ OTC.
Bullish divergence forming due to bid whacks
Somebody here is capitulating
Shares getting soaked up by me & others
Thanks in advance
Get back to me when you have factual doc link(s) instead of med induced conjecture .
Gotta go, my cat has swimming lessons in an hour.
Been fun
The lack of legitimacy is ipsi facto definition of FRAUD
“ YIKES “ is correct
“How would he have been defrauded if those shares werent legitimately eatablished”
Court is cheap…Discovery Fees ARE NOT.
Truth is I don’t give a rats a$$ about yor particular opinions.
I’m bored at present, only reason I’m responding
What shows is Caywood defrauded HD
It DOES NOT legitimize shares in question
Full of conjecture & as usual lacking on doc links.
Settlement can ( and will ) occur.
Neither side wants to incur THOUSANDS of dollars in lawyers fees… ESPECIALLY HD
Once again I’ll ask…wager on “months” theory ?
Still waiting on initial offer
Caywood has a history of using promised shares to swindle / con people.
JPX GLOBAL, INC.
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
“ On May 20, 2014, the Company was served in a Utah lawsuit entitled “Robert Denman, Plaintiff, v. JPX Global, Inc., Joseph A. Caywood, and John D. Thomas, Defendants”. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract in connection with a December 2012 Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) between Robert Denman (“Denman”) and Joseph Caywood (“Caywood”). The lawsuit alleges that Caywood failed to pay Denman any of the $100,000 Promissory Note due February 28, 2013 which Denman received from Caywood as consideration for the agreed sale of 20,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the SPA and that the Company has not returned the 20,000,000 shares of common stock (which are still registered in the name of Denman) to Denman.
On August 28, 2014, pursuant to a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Company on August 26, 2014, the Utah court dismissed all claims against the Company for lack of personal jurisdiction but retained jurisdiction over the 20,000,000 shares of common stock in question until the issuance of an appropriate, final order regarding the disposition thereof.”
Guess we know who held it in 007’s now
Most of us are not
$JPEX
$JPEX
“ CASE CLOSED “
A-21-835979-C | Alpharidge Capital LLC, Plaintiff(s) vs. JPX Global, Inc., Defendant(s)
Case Number
A-21-835979-C
Court
Department 27
Judicial Officer
Allf, Nancy
File Date
06/09/2021
Case Type
Other Civil Matters
Case Status
Closed
$JPEX
“ CASE CLOSED “
A-21-835979-C | Alpharidge Capital LLC, Plaintiff(s) vs. JPX Global, Inc., Defendant(s)
Case Number
A-21-835979-C
Court
Department 27
Judicial Officer
Allf, Nancy
File Date
06/09/2021
Case Type
Other Civil Matters
Case Status????
Closed ??????
LandToSea is correct.
“Probation” definition does not apply to this particular case.
The one I posted is directly correlated to jpex case
Certainly looks that way !!
What does disposed for statistical purposes mean?
A code that the court uses to show that a settlement has been reached or the case was disposed of in some way that wasn’t a verdict for either side. It means a case is over and has been reported as resolved for the court’s internal statistical purposes or administrative oversight.
“ 03/17/2022 Order to Statistically Close Case “
https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Portal/Case/CaseDetail?eid=GG5KWCeh75uRdZgCf3s7FQ2&tabIndex=3
Nicely composed
Well done KRS2
Wanna wager on that?
$$ where mouth is
Thanks Kramrer
I know that’s why I said resubmitting. My point is they haven’t released anything for a while now. Today they resubmitted a previous news release… Which they would have had to pay for. That’s the point
$JPEX resubmitting Veemost news again as of today.
Something changed ?
News sites do not release unless paid to do so.
“New York, NY -- March 17, 2022 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via Traders News Source, a leading independent equity research and corporate access firm focused on small cap growth companies issues new research reports and a feature NFT/Metaverse hot sector analysis.
VeeMost Technologies, LTD has acquired a majority interest in JPX Global, Inc. (OTCPNK: JPEX) with a name change to follow. VeeMost recently launched VeeShield Cloud Security, their first security product offering. VeeShield will be offered in three packages: Pro, Pro+, and Cloud hybrid next-generation firewall, all with technical services to support the product. VeeShield is initially being made available only to VeeMost’s corporate customers then will be publicly available for all enterprise users and home users at a date in the future. “
Seems like a desperate & factually baseless post
Only scenario I can presume is HD argued that any / all forward progress allowing finalization of merger would jeopardize / harm his ongoing case with Caywood.
Judges don’t like to encroach on other current court proceedings.
No worries my friend !
You’re very welcome !
I agree
Caywood filed BK to stiff HumpDick
He’s clearly suing anyone & everyone in hopes of getting a Hail Mary payday
His dispute is with Caywood / Scorpex Scam
HOVENDICK v. CAYWOOD
Adversary Proceeding
Lead BK case is: 2:21-bk-11884
Nevada Bankruptcy Court
Chapter 7
Judge: Natalie M Cox
Case #: 2:21-ap-01080
Nature of Suit 67 Bankruptcy - Dischargeability - §523(a)(4), fraud as fiduciary, embezzlement, larceny
68 Bankruptcy - Dischargeability - §523(a)(6), willful and malicious injury
72 Bankruptcy - Injunctive relief - other
41 Bankruptcy - Objection / revocation of discharge - §727(c),(d),(e)
62 Bankruptcy - Dischargeability - §523(a)(2), false pretenses, false representation, actual fraud
Makes sense
Is it possible Hovendick is using this tactic while reaching out to Veemost with the offer “ I’m the one that can take you to the dance “ ?
Write him in & all monies paid till now honoured.
Allow shares to remain with stipulations & he’ll sign off on new merger agreement.
Temporary injunction to force them to negotiate.
? - how many days is injunction ordered by judge to work things out
? - if H’dick doesn’t budge will court see unwillingness as bargaining in bad faith & step in
Forward movement stalled till he gets an offer suitable to him.
I’ll admit he’s got Frank cornered at present.
Ur in the right spot
Hubcess suits u
Bye
Says who?
It’s a negotiation tactic…that’s all
FULL STOP
Nothing to do with merger.
Just a matter of agreeing on what # to write on the check