Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I heard something about that a LONG time ago. Might be last year's news, but I'm not sure about it.
20 to 100 million?! Uh...us farmers don't have that many fingers. We have some big-time operators here.
I took it to mean referring to Post #160039.
That sounds very out-of-character for Tom as he doesn't usually express himself in such schoolyard terms. To everyone their own opinion.
I remember hearing the title Admiral used awhile back when it posted for the first time (to my knowledge).
I was under the impression an eager poster dug it up while researching and decided, on a whimsical lark, to use it as a theatrical novelty on this board. Never gave it much serious thought, but don't recall Tom actually ever referring to himself as "Admiral" unless he decided to play along with the comical hype.
It's just an honorary thing, in Texas I guess. I never once felt that Tom used the term to make himself seem "bloviating," like some folks who habitually use the word.
If I felt that way I'd blame it on my imagination because that's where most peoples' opinion(s) gestate. But what do I know? Others may be far more perceptive than I. GLTY.
I've seen no announcement of the airing date yet, so perhaps it hasn't been announced (or even decided) yet. Period. I sort of felt everyone came to that conclusion already(?)
I don't know much about his involvement with the tour business. I mostly ignored it as it became a hammering point with the negative nellies here.
But IMVHO, if the merger should create major demands on his time and effort, to where the tour business became burdensome, he'd either farm the tour guide role out to a hired subordinate and concentrate on the post merger company, or ditch the tour business altogether.
No matter who, a person can only spread themselves so thin.
Maybe he has other options we don't know about?
Just for humor, if it's Dennis, he butters his toast on both sides!
Gee, I thought it was SAX, as in, Dance to the music, Shareholders!
See #147575.
I'm personally not concerned with the cost of the wall. Long-term, it will be miniscule compared to the cost of inbound illegals. Apparently the following wasn't picked up by enough people to suppress cries of how much it will cost cost to BUILD the wall. It's an investment that "pays back" as long as the wall stands. Build it. NOW! IMHO
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/09/27/illegal-immigration-costs-taxpayers-116b-annually-claims-study/
Click on "Bravatek Solutions Inc. (BVTK)" above the main text box on any post.
DO = Dennis O'Leary.
Congrats on your timely, fortuitous purchase! Had it occurred to you some buyers/investors only DISCOVERED BVTK when SP was .005 and was "Headed for Dollars!" overnight? No? I thought not. Sometimes it's hard to know when someone else should or should not have purchased. Long & hoping!
I have it penciled in my calendar that we're expecting a 10-Q for revenues today. Am I wrong about that?
I'll take it! It's one more step UP the staircase. And thank you for posting.
I trust Tom but Tom's not in the driver's seat when it comes to share price. He works to build the company and is shrewdly successful at it.
The share price is the result of what Shotsky spoke about several times, manipulation by the cabal of billion-share owners quietly and discreetly seated on Facebook.
Whenever something good happens, the share price takes a nose dive so weak hands sell and smart hands buy. I mean the DEEP pockets that can move this stock anytime and any way they want.
As smaller retail investors, we have no defense against that, but there's no sense in blaming Tom for a tumbling share price as reflected in every second post on iHub.
I tend to think a shareholder letter would be somewhat meat & potatoes (concise and to the point) without much detail which is often viewed as frivolous banter.
To really grasp the sentiment of the CC I was hoping to hear of an actual written transcript made available which would better convey the updated information provide by the CEOs, as well as the tenor of the questions posed to them afterward and their detailed replies to those questions.
Also, a transcript can be saved and re-read as often as needed for future reference as other information becomes available and comparison or confirmation statements are sought.
The way these dynamos are running this show, it's not beyond hope to hear information that no one would have thought to ask in the Q&A session. There is simply a staggering amount of activity going on behind the scenes that has not yet been disclosed to the public, and the CC call may be an opportunity for it.
This will be very interesting. I'm still hoping.
Does anyone have an idea if there will be a written transcript of the CC call made available for those who have no way of accessing the call at the time it occurs? Oftentimes there is, but not always. I'm trying to find out.
(LOL) Might I ask what you've been smoking, or is that a dead giveaway?
Posts #126431 & #126433.
Whew! Please forgive me. My eyes must've fallen on the floor and I retrieved them to the wrong sockets. Honestly, I wasn't like this before I came to this board. Serves me right for taking everyone seriously.
I wish they'd STOP trying to confuse me!
The parent company is CrucialTec!
The subordinate division is TrucialCrack!
Let that be the END of it!
If you say so.
Yes, but it IS "CrucialTec" that's dealing with Google. Punch the link to the Korean publication below the text on Post #125764 and READ it.
Not sure if it makes a meaningful difference; may or may not.
Oh, I think that's terrible! I'm sorry you feel that way and am SO glad I don't share your opinion. Good luck to you. #BVTK
They just can't leave it alone. They just have to keep driving it into the ground.
THANK YOU! You're a ray of sunshine on a cloudy day. #BVTK
I've been slogging through his fog bank and smoke screen all night! Has no one caught on to the shell game? Tom himself tweeted that agreeable "equity investor(s)" would do the buyback, not corporate #BVTK, so the burden of share reduction would be sidetracked; common for restricted. That's what I got out of it anyway and couldn't understand this constant harping about illegalities. Back to my plow now.
I'd guess he's certain, I'm sure that's my guess. Oh, how I LOVE this stock and the happy people on this board!
If he says it, he doesn't mean it!
Is there a share price requirement to qualify for upgrading to NASDAQ?
Didn't someone post a message yesterday about a wall contract we got worth $430 million? Any further info on that? I haven't been able to find anything.
No, Bermuda onions, "Bermuda Onions!", the ones growing from softball to cantaloupe size, the ones with extra thin layers, tender skins, and sweetest flavor, the ones with a fragrance so divine you can smell it when it's aboard ship on its way to you, the ones kissed before bedtime each night by adolescent maidens given the job of tending one (1) each season until it's ready for harvest! BERMUDA Onions! Well, you must be young and they've been getting kinda scarce of late. And again, sometimes it takes a farmer to tell.
If #BVTK and/or Dark Pulse protects against those, well, I'm selling my shares Monday morning. That's it. Don't try to stop me!
Oh, I guess I can overlook a lot from Bermuda as long as they keep shipping the onions (everyone has a price, after all).
As for whether Dark Pulse can protect us from onions, you'll have to ask Dark Pulse about that.
Might they be called "Towers," d'ya think?
Now THAT'S something he can understand!
If you're right, I think I'll sing Cohen's "HALLELUIAH!" Shock is a stinker! I'd better get some spare batteries for my Pacemaker.
Nothing will move until the MMs WANT IT to move, and they CAN pull out all the stops to hold it fast. The SP we SEE is the result of many factors, not all of which are ones we suspect.