Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think this is one where it’s not so much about charts but rather news and events. You reference the one year and 6 month charts but there were catalysts driving those. A year ago there were filings and promises of additional filings that drove the price north. The 6 month chart captures the settlement and ensuing feeding frenzy of high expectations followed by the crash. That said, this very well could be poised for a move up with filings to bring the company current submitted. Now we await approval. A declaration of being current would surely move the price up and could happen at any time. GLTA.
Thanks for that info, it is very helpful. Does anyone have a realistic estimate on when this should all be processed/approved and the company officially be declared current? I don’t know what the normal turnaround time is so any additional info here is helpful. GLTA.
You are correct that some had absolute pipe dream amounts in their heads for settlement amounts. Where Glenn erred was the tweet or email to shareholder (I forget which it was at this point) where he said that shareholders would be happy with the settlement. Not suggesting ill intentions but I don’t understand how he couldn’t see it would be a major letdown for expectations and that’s discounting the pipe dream amounts. Obviously it was a major letdown, just look at what happened to the share price upon announcement. I certainly should have sold more early and that is my own fault but he raised expectations by putting that message out there.
Anyway, I still hold a lot of shares that I am hoping will increase in value. Looking forward. GLTA.
Note: I only get one post today right now so can’t reply to any replies to this post.
Just read an article that Dave Grohl’s daughters are obsessed wIth her. Will check more out. Anyway, back On topic...
What do we know about the promised Incoming monthLy expenses? Amounts? And any other upcoming business? I am severely disappointed on the settlement but no brasher. I still see value but so many questions.
GLTA
$CMGO
No, he really didn’t IF everything posted is true. Is it really him? That is one question of many.
I am a longtime LONG and even with the bloodbath yesterday, I am green. But really? After all of that, a 2 million net? We are supposed to be happy? We deserve answers. I have defended the team and perhaps ultimately rightfully so but many of us have skin in this game.
I have not yet bailed but come on, give us something for years and money on the line. This could still bounce back but come on....
I don’t think it’s all a scam but something doesn’t add up. Just not sure how the pieces fit. I did not expect a $200 million settlement but only $2 million and we are supposed to be happy?
Come on Glenn. Talk to us... we deserve answers
I am on restriction so will not be able to otherwise respond again today. But GLTA.
$CMGO
Exactly right. It will be good. $CMGO
Agreed it will hit hard and fast IMO. Long and strong $CMGO
It’s coming. Maybe Monday. $CMGO
Indeed, all of us “bagholders” are up 5 to 10 bags. Or more. Your mileage may very. I am doing very well. $CMGO
I think you might be right. I think. But I think you’re right. $CMGO
I am holding. Big. $CMGO
Ready for launch. $CMGO
Very true.
Exactly. April 1 is a TARGET date. Not guaranteed. No need for alarm if that date passes without news. People need to understand that. We are close here.
And it is certainly not the circus without the clowns.
$CMGO
Well aware, my friend. It may be tomorrow, it may be Monday, it may be another week or whenever. It is close though, especially for those who have held for years. $CMGO
Haha haha. You’re the man. Classic. $CMGO
I also count one. Settlement, that is. Holding for the pop on announcement of filings. And perhaps some beyond. Not much longer to wait. Getcha popcorn ready. $CMGO
A better time to sell would be when $CMGO pops. And it is going to pop big. Soon.
Then I will save you some time. If he stated in a legal proceeding that he did not own any shares, I take him at his word, under oath. However, as you point out, there are/were warrants that expire soon. Would it not be safe to assume that with the share price above the purchase price of the warrants that he would exercise those options? Seems pretty smart to me. If it happened after any legal proceeding, then how would that constitute perjury? It does not. Case closed.
#FactsMatter
#MoneyTalksBSWalks
Not at all. Why would you reach that conclusion? When did he testify that he did not own any shares?
Lower entries could be on the horizon. Maybe, maybe not. But I know that higher exits are on the horizon, not too far away. I am happy holding where I am.
It has to go down to buy low. Duh...
Also Could be Look Out You Shorts?
$CMGO
Longs Own Your Stock?
CMGO$
Yeah, kinda.
Well most bought different lots at different prices on different days. So is the argument now that you can cherry pick a low buy price for a lot and claim a high sell price on those particular shares? How do the lots bought at a significantly higher price factor in? Do those become “water fountain” rather than “champagne” money? Is it a variable moving target? Just trying to understand.
As for the part about asking Glenn, I don’t understand what you are getting at there.
The only variable here is your share price which changed from .0009 in one post to .0007 (and varies?) in the latest. I assumed nothing, I took you at your word in the original posts. You are now varying the share price in this post.
I didn’t need to assume number of shares though, I just used the numbers you provided, prices by lot size. I was even nice enough to be conservative on the sell price of your lot, only using $9,000 instead of the “plus” you stated. You’re welcome.
The math stands.
Your math doesn’t check out. Your lots were bought at $250 and sold for $9,000 plus according to your earlier post:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147736523
So, if you bought at .0009, then your sale price = (9000/250) x (.0009) = .0324. The 52 week high is .0294 and hasn’t been higher than that in years. Busted.
#MoneyTalksBSWalks
#FactsMatter
Well done ytse. I bought in a long time ago, before XA was derailed by thieves. Not as long ago or as high as those who bought above current share prices but long enough to have gotten AEYE shares, sold those long ago. When the stock tanked, I averaged down big time and monitored. Never wavered. For all of those who did the same, we are about to be rewarded handsomely. Thank you Glenn for never giving up. Almost time to celebrate! $CMGO
Exactly right. People really should read up on the laws on RICO, punitive damages, etc. There is a reason that the calculations put the defendants’ exposure at $280 million or so if this went to trial. That does not mean that is what CMG would have been awarded or what the actual settlement is. But the people guessing the settlement is $10 million are not likely to be accurate. I don’t expect $200 million but it isn’t going to be peanuts either. Opening an office in Manhattan requires some cash. If it were some piddling amount, CMG would have just taken it to trial.
Everyone should do their own DD. Read all of the documents. Make your own conclusions. Realize what you see here. I know I do and I will not be selling my shares cheaply.
GLTA. $CMGO for the win!
Right on.
Actually, quite a few of us have believed it will run much further, from a lower price than you reference, for quite a while now. Years, in fact. All of the long suffering longs have. The suffering is over, however, and the celebrating is rapidly approaching. GLTA.
Exactly.
Psst: it doesn’t.
#MoneyTalksBSWalks
#CMGO$
Preach it brother! CMGO$ for the win!
Ha! Just another day around here. But in the morning we roll again! Onward!
#MoneyTalksBSWalks
I will clarify my intent. It covers info pertaining to the 3rd party, for those who are a party to the agreement. So yes, the parties cannot publicly implicate a 3rd party. However, that does not mean there was not a 3rd party that acted unethically, behaved poorly, could be liable, etc. Not a part of the suit but the NDA could be in place to suppress the parties to the NDA from implicating said 3rd party publicly.
Bottom line, the main point still stands. The dots are out there for all to connect, despite any misinformation others may try to disseminate. Each investor should do their own DD and understand what we have here. There is a reason the price is going up and up and up. People are figuring it out. GLTA. CMGO$
NDA covers all parties and info in it. Prevents one party from revealing relevant facts, including a 3rd party’s guilty behavior if such occurred. It is in place to hide the smoke of the smoking guns, wherever they may lie.