Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If the only thing I knew about RVNC was that they had the most superior Botulinum toxin on the market for years ahead, would that automatically confer/ bestow immediate stock value translated into, now at its current stock price and current management , is the compelling time to buy RVNC? And what argument would I use to duel with distractors who contend RVNC must dilute , to boost their financial' s by adjusting stock price lower with the value of those shares sold allowing them to remain solvent, insuring inflicting near term pain for current stock holders?
its the % loss which is worthy of analysis., but I will add all bones howed at lowest point and i could o fgot some film roles of a 1/2 starved prisoner.
I adhere to a diet which baffles me why it is so hard for others to follow.
Nothing is perfect, but my diet mimics an intermittent diet, but my first rule is I never wish to feel deprived.
I am addicted to sugar but when once tested for pre-diabetes all foods seemed to be a gun pointed, as I am too cowardly to endure the real diabetes. I was stunned into checking sugar and carbo %'s in everything I ate. But foremost to this one sentence diet, is no eating till 5:00 P.M., upped recently to try for 6:00 P.M.
My "cheating" includes having coffee once or twice a day with plain unsweetened almond milk, and a 1/2 inch of something like a cookie.
On scouts honor, I do not at all have any hunger urgencies till I start to eat real food after 5:00 P.M.
True my temperament does favor chicken and fish menus and love of vegie salads, and almost any fruit. I was 185 when I decided to fight the pre- diabetic diagnosis and after about two months of the aforementioned diet I eased comfortably to 145.
I now eat 3 times after dinner (5-6 P.M.) till about 9:00, loading up after my main dinner meal, on pistachios, eggs, popcorn, pizza, pieces of soda bread with Steevia (instead of sugar).
I have remained at 150 - 155 for 5 years. I was less guarded about measuring carbs once my pre-diabetes abated, and everyone thought I was too skinny.
The intermittent diet I follow guarantees I do not put on excess weight. The intermittent diet is scientifically said to have more potency if the 4 hour of fasting occurred earlier from the morning and . then wait the 16 hours for next feed-up.........this I cannot do . Scientific journals found that the intermittent diet is effective against promoting inflammatory conditions and may strengthen the immune system, but they did not know why.......Very recently scientific studies suggested that the intermittent diet may work because during the gap of no food, the body is deprived of specific amino acids groupings, and this time span deprivation of these molecules triggers/ strengthens "excellent" healthy conditions.
A different intermittent fasting diet consisting of fasting for 3 days on and off is which is suggested to be a more effective diet , but I would only attempt this fasting diet if my life depended on it, as I have no discipline to join such a torturous challenge.
Again. any new diets may be hard to adhere to because so many decisions regarding selection, when to eat, what to eat, what to avoid, challenge all the mental processes which were most efficient to accommodate a "feeling" of well being Any new will probably continuously feud with self-control.
Except for limiting sugar and never binging on fabulous bread, In my one sentence diet, I eat all I wish from 5- 10 P.M. focusing on the few "fun" products which are not factory refined to my heart's content. This habitual diet routine does not summon any special challenges except making me more self conscious when my hotel reservations includes a free "gala" breakfast.
Yes, the odds are great for functional precision medicine (FPM) to be ultimately effective, but if the FPM platform was selected to command and be recognized as leading the hierarchy of cancer's research ultimate goals, enormous time would be shortened. If FPM served just as a universal focused vocabulary to order every forthcoming minor discovery in the field, this will yield efficiencies in resource allocation. Too complicated to explain by me, but I "suspect" many disciplines
and tools such as mathematical models which include principles of mathematical control theory and dynamical systems analysis would be useful to this platform. Single focused current initiative tactics are all essential to cancer research, but hidden from present knowledge are the value of the multi forces comprising the evolutionary successful systematic processes, which permit, the "nasty" elements of aggressive cancer to survive. The effectiveness of uncovering the magnitude, direction, plus other forces, all the parts in swirling combination, will probably offer the quickest way of taming this phenomenon. Just as search is essential to Google, FPM may be essential to cancer research.
Cancer research........1000's of scientific promising summaries of studies read my me for decades.
In my opinion this Nature featured link, is the only one which sticks in reigning over mastering the scale to address all aggressive cancers, unless I was biased to be involved with the magic selection of one of hundreds of platforms and initiatives (i.e. CRISPR, CART- cell therapy, etc)........ and not to downplay their contributions, which I think will only exert future partial promise, in comparison to the inevitable progress this platform can deliver:
"The future of precision cancer therapy might be to try ..."
"His story is a testament to this kind of intensive and highly personalized drug-screening method, referred to as functional precision medicine. Like all precision medicine, it aims to match treatments to patients, but it differs from the genomics-guided paradigm that has come to dominate the field. Instead of relying on genetic data and the best available understanding of tumor biology to select a treatment, clinicians throw everything they’ve got at cancer cells in the laboratory and see what sticks"
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00392-2
BIVI: yes I was wrong, they were really on F team.
Can't find private mail sent archive.
Possible facts :new avenues of drug discovery published daily juiced to the max with AI and other computational data collection advances lack ideal funding to promote reducing mortality rates..
Advances in formulating drug Co. abuses are both a worthy chore and dangerous signal to reduce funding.
Sorry about the reinfection after all that caution ( I assume you got the new variant), just one question.: how long was it from your last booster shot?
To date, there is no therapy targeting EMT in cancer. So this comment in a study published in Nature "seems" interesting:
"We are extremely happy and excited to have identified the first drug that can target EMT in vivo and therefore reduce
the formation of metastases and resistance to chemotherapy",
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230802/New-drug-targets-EMT-in-cancer-reducing-metastasis-and-resistance-to-chemotherapy.aspx
Is that blood test measuring the progression of Alzheimer matched with some ongoing remedy?
The dilemma may be ( and put clumsily), that medical science has a mandate to do no harm , but perhaps balance the lower orders of dejected , desolate and grievous states of inconsolable consternation, against supporting thoughts alighted with a template offering comforting "modest " improvement.
Re; bempedoic acid, have no confirming link but one party "said" to me their doctor claimed it was too weak to reduce cholesterol level for that patient.
Thanks
Isn't your link using a different therapeutic radiation method than the one I linked?
"The word, “almost” is a little unsettling here."
True not ideal but they seem to conclude in theory that the " almos" (not effect the normal cells)t may be satisfactory?
"Team reports on development of potential new generic treatment for multiple types of cancer"
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-06-team-potential-generic-treatment-multiple.html
Only mice tested but worth 100 billion if works effectively on humans (in my opinion). Wonder if they (in Japan) are only one on this
type of approach?
TRIL I did not follow closely but great insight by you to invest in this CD-47 "player" (as hundreds of other strategies always compete for attention), and clearly closer causation my link yesterday pronounced:
"Turning off this pathway—a checkpoint interaction between a protein called SIRPa on the macrophage and the CD47 protein found on all 'self' cells—was the key to creating this therapy."
Regarding this type of bioengineering involving white blood cells , I am not qualified to place this news within the landscape of previous scientific pathways, but because of the high cost of personalized targeting
for each patient, the article does offer the fairy godmother wish that a Saviour would come along to replicate this personalized patient success with an off the shelf methodology. at much lower cost.
Yet the aforementioned I referred to, is still a lavish wish, involving macrophages, as the substance of all this possible road to success to eliminate cancer has not gone beyond in vivo.
Another group from Penn university bioengineering dept on steroids today, trying to topple
some of the totally incurable:
"RNA nanoparticle therapy stops the spread of incurable bone marrow cancer, study finds:
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-06-rna-nanoparticle-therapy-incurable-bone.html
Only in vivo: but for millions of cancer patients with the most challenging odds against them, this is the most promising strategy ever ( in my opinion) published, and although it comes from University of Penn, I did not realize ( until recetly) they may be in the forefront of the most promising cancer research:
"Engineered white blood cells can eliminate cancer, shows study"
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-06-white-blood-cells-cancer.html
"Osimertinib halves lung cancer deaths"
Perhaps partially true from Nature (briefing) with people with a specific gene, but best cancer headline ever read on the attention getting meter.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jun/04/lung-cancer-pill-cuts-risk-of-death-by-half-says-thrilling-study?utm_source=Nature+Briefing%3A+Cancer&utm_campaign=1b5e8b55cf-briefing-cancer-20230608&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5ba5ae5c14-1b5e8b55cf-47586544&mc_cid=1b5e8b55cf&mc_eid=c52b0f142a
New Recap of classes of diet medication in tidy summary:
Opinion | What happened when I took Ozempic - The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/06/06/ozempicweight-loss-ruth-marcus/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F3a37a02%2F647f5930e49da13a6d4aca5d%2F597fee68ade4e26514d5b4ed%2F17%2F72%2F647f5930e49da13a6d4aca5d
TMNA allegations here astounding and even if partially accurate suggest TMNA is doomed.
"Hindenburg Research is not a legitimate research and investigative company. Instead, it is a short-selling looter that profits through unethical securities fraud. The company is under investigation by the FBI and has many flaws, including a lack of transparency about its origin and financial reports.Feb 13, 2023"
Google abbreviated commentary, when you search Hindenburg report.
"No other treatments on the market or in clinical trials have shown the ability to halt the progression of diabetes."
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-06-wharton-jelly-halt-diabetes-phase.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter
DTIL .77 and this this morning:
Precision BioSciences to meet with FDA after touting allogeneic CAR-T win
https://endpts.com/precision-biosciences-to-meet-with-fda-after-touting-allogeneic-car-t-win/
But market6 does not think they will not need too much cash before gems show?
NCpL 1.28 added.
NCPL 1.35 added.
Says I am on ground floor , but have to use the back entrance, yet allowed to wave to TIO betters who just moved to better grounds.
NCPL 1.55 offering knocked it down yesterday, they retied some debt so have pathway tp move as baggage lightened and just a touch of right new news has followers to spurp up before it seeks lower.
And yet the artistry of its confusion can make a snail run.
HTCR: this killed the picture for me:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171969378
NCPL 1.46 added.
OT: tidy truths can appear bombastic,lol.
On trail of a 10 bagger, I hit fork in road.....Super smart Nigerian prodigy tangles with scammy broke bloke who gets woke, does the 10 bagger leaving super smart African magnate's stock stuck....deal started and finished, 10 bagger fought and won ( by all recent TIO's), TMNA holders waiting and arguing over the crumbs! Yes still in lost 10 bagger ward, with other failures waiting for new interpretations of future glory.
HTCR 2.50:may have legs, I bought 1.98 sold 3.29 but want this near 2 again as their Go IPO division in Japan is a revenue monster.
HTCR 3.43 HOD nice Swamp!
HTCR 1.95: their Go IPO division is a monster. If sustainable stock could double.
NCPL 3.20 high to $2 today, , wonder if I should tell Swamp to rub more on soon?