Home > Boards > US OTC > Miscellaneous >

Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (SPNGQ)

SPNGQ RSS Feed 		Add SPNGQ Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator scion, flaflyersfan, Renee, Eliot Ness
Search This Board:
Last Post: 5/17/2013 11:23:21 AM - Followers: 738 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0
                


Licensing Established For Products:
 

July 1st 2009 - Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. Expands Nickelodeon and Viacom Licensing Agreement in Canada

November 14th 2009 - SpongeTech Delivery Systems, Inc. entered into a license agreement with Marvel Characters B.V.

 

SEC Enforcement Litigation Releases: 

May 5th 2010 - Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3131 / May 5, 2010


Up-To-Date Media and Blog News:

January 15th 2012 - SEC adds Metter's Greenwich Radio Station as Defendant in Spongetech Fraud Suit (Teri Buhl - Blog)
May 23rd 2012 -        Big glitch in feds' case against Spongetech - (Aaron Elstein - Crains)
August 7th 2012 -     Bankrupt Spongetech Racked Up $9.5M In Unpaid Sports Sponsorship, Advertising Bills (David Broughton, sportsBusiness Journal)


Bankruptcy / Civil / Criminal Court Proceedings - Motion/Filings/Memorandum and Orders:

May 17th 2012 -      United States v. Metter - Criminal Case
May 25th 2012 -      SEC v. Spongetech - Civil Case - Doc 231 Letter Enclosing Settlement Documents for Moskowitz by SEC
May 25th 2012 -      SEC v. Spongetech - Doc 231-2 Consent of Steven Moskowitz
July 11th 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 242 First Motion for Ext. of Time to File the Gov's Resp. to Def's July 6th 2012 Motion for Discl. by USA to Metter
July 16th 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 243 Motion to Suppress (Newly Disclosed Subpoenaed Spongetech Backup Hard Drive) by Michael Metter
July 31st 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 252 - Gov's Sealed Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Discovery
August 6th 2012 -   SEC v. Spongetech - Civil Case - Doc 236 Order Granting 237 Motion for Extension of Time to File
August 13th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 255 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response by USA as to Michael Metter
August 17th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 256 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to 255, filed by Metter
August 17th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 257 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 243 Motion to Suppress Newly Disclosed Subpoenaed Spongetech Backup Hard Drive (Reilly, Nathan)

Bankruptcy Court Proceedings Regarding SpongeTech's Assets Dicon  / BTR

June 25th 2012 - Dicon Doc 366 Chapter 11 Ballot Filed by Christine Brenner (Rejects)
June 26th 2012 - Dicon Doc 371 Chapter 11 Ballot Filed by Leland J. Markle (Rejects)
July 26th 2012 -  SEC v. Spongetech - Doc 238 Letter Regarding Appointment of Receiver over BTR by SEC


Bankruptcy Proceedings - Shareholder Estate Rep Motion/Filings:


Bankruptcy Proceedings - Shareholder Letter/EMails to Honorable Judge Bernstein:

July 11th 2012 -      Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 389 Letter Re EMail
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh, "Spongetech Doc 390-7 SEC Complaint
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-4 SPNG Master Transaction Journal 7-22 "
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-6 Economic Warfare Risks and Responses by Kevin D. Freeman"
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-7 SEC Complaint"
July 31st 2012 -      Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 392 Letter Email
August 2nd 2012 -  Filed by Julia Shumko, "Spongetech Doc 393 Letter Email
August 2nd 2012 -  Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 394 Letter Email DOJ Protective Order
August 14th 2012 - Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 395 Letter Re: "Emerald Asset Advisors LLC"

BK Trustee's Status Conference Transcripts: * next status conference scheduled for Sept. 25th 2012

June 26th 2012 - Chapter 7 Status Conference

* SpongeTech Trustee' Website *


Class Action Lawsuit Information:

May 1st 2012 - Spongetech Class Action Doc 69 Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Jury Trial Demanded

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
SPNGQ
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
SPNGQ Detailed Quote Wiki
SPNGQ News: SEC Litigation Release 01/04/2013 03:10:40 PM
PostSubject
#341653   I fully understand the risks of the market, alien42 05/17/13 11:19:45 AM
#341652   Oh, I fully agree with you there. ctrumabll 05/16/13 05:36:32 PM
#341651   CTRUMABLL & DPILON, oilspec 05/16/13 04:28:50 PM
#341650   I also think that, because SPNG's successful "year ctrumabll 05/14/13 04:03:29 PM
#341649   DPILON: You are wrong. The SpongeTech oilspec 05/14/13 02:41:47 PM
#341648   Who's holding the illegitimate profits ctrumabll 05/14/13 10:56:03 AM
#341647   Your post violates Heinlein's razor. Have you ctrumabll 05/14/13 10:54:03 AM
#341645   Yes, there was so much "evidence" on an KLee 05/14/13 09:34:14 AM
#341644   UNDER ARMOUR steals SPONGETECH brand WHY? dpilon 05/14/13 07:49:36 AM
#341643   because, unfortunately, that is the only felony that 236T568 05/14/13 01:38:04 AM
#341642   Shareholders lose everything. Eliot Ness 05/13/13 11:08:37 PM
#341641   The evidence was a HD from a computer. Eliot Ness 05/13/13 11:05:07 PM
#341640   So is the chance of restitution still an Tha Crate Mayne 05/13/13 08:57:49 PM
#341639   Shoot, that seems like a litigation tactics question. ctrumabll 05/13/13 06:48:06 PM
#341638   I was asking, since the one charge they kegparty 05/13/13 05:33:08 PM
#341637   Well, when the DoJ messed up, no doubt ctrumabll 05/13/13 04:24:41 PM
#341636   Yes, DOJ held on to evidence, too long, kegparty 05/13/13 04:11:33 PM
#341635   Actually, the DoJ said meathead did plenty wrong. ctrumabll 05/13/13 03:18:46 PM
#341634   Please, show me where the DOJ said Meathead pantherj 05/13/13 12:16:39 PM
#341633   DOJ reached a plea deal with Metter: ctrumabll 05/13/13 11:07:44 AM
#341632   actually, no 236T568 05/13/13 11:03:37 AM
#341631   Jim Clark has SEC $52M? METTER no WHERE dpilon 05/13/13 07:48:24 AM
#341630   I just wanted to do this one last GreenMachine 05/12/13 09:04:21 AM
#341629   Exactly how is a BLUE SHEETS subpoena different ctrumabll 05/11/13 10:41:03 AM
#341628   05/09/2013 281 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Solution Funding scion 05/10/13 11:26:38 AM
#341627   Pacer update 09 May 13 - SEC v scion 05/10/13 11:23:14 AM
#341626   what do you mean it's over? is this alien42 05/10/13 10:53:39 AM
#341625   The end of SPNGQ .. already happened puppydotcom 05/10/13 09:44:40 AM
#341623   i told you it was over. Litchfield 05/10/13 06:20:49 AM
#341622   I agree, don't spoil the party! LOL! starfire 05/09/13 11:20:04 PM
#341621   Yes, don't spoil the fun. Those people from 236T568 05/09/13 07:23:34 PM
#341620   Don't spoil the fun!! lol pantherj 05/09/13 06:07:15 PM
#341619   Seriously? Have you looked into who CEDE is? LOL SRV-90 05/09/13 11:40:09 AM
#341618   if it were so easy to short penny alien42 05/09/13 10:15:16 AM
#341617   CONFIRMED by the FOUNDER of the company! puppydotcom 05/09/13 09:34:48 AM
#341616   Our BLUE SHEETS subpoena has been objected as dpilon 05/09/13 06:00:09 AM
#341614   Having enough money to short a scam can Eliot Ness 05/08/13 05:37:52 PM
#341613   ©u dont ever have to cover ANY short dpilon 05/08/13 07:59:24 AM
#341612   Even IF the nakeds settle. We will only Litchfield 05/07/13 10:15:22 PM
#341611   Well, it is a good month, if one ctrumabll 05/07/13 03:23:19 PM
#341609   Are they going to let the BULLs out...is starfire 05/07/13 11:51:14 AM
#341608   It seems you have these naked spongetech shorters Ripnrob 05/07/13 11:38:09 AM
#341607   Our day is coming where there will be Frontline19721 05/07/13 10:42:21 AM
#341606   Nickelodeon (not me, not Metter, not Moskowitz) said dpilon 05/07/13 08:07:49 AM
#341605   dpilon, why quote the founder of the company alien42 05/06/13 11:09:33 AM
#341604   Is SPNG on NASDAQ yet? dlewisfl 05/06/13 10:55:12 AM
#341603   SpongeTech has BILLIONS illegal DWAC CEDE SHORTS. CONFIRMED dpilon 05/06/13 07:45:01 AM
#341602   Thanks.... Litchfield 05/06/13 05:49:33 AM
#341601   you are correct here 236T568 05/06/13 03:12:27 AM
#341600   Oh, but the company did need to be pantherj 05/05/13 11:19:22 PM
PostSubject