Manage your investments with ADVFN charting and news products! Streamer Level 2 Charts Trades Portfolio Top Lists Forex
Sign up for a FREE account, or check out our boards! Login Home REGISTER FREE! Mailbox Boards Favorites Hot! Settings Other
Stock Quote: Search:
Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT) | Show iBox |

Stock Quote, News, Charts

Board Search:
Moderator: mastaflash Assistants: kodiak149, dustybutler1, ditch72, allezlOM, f1fans Boardmarks: 355
Created: 5/6/2005 4:34:33 PM Board type: Free
new Hangouts -  Surveys -  Bans
Go to Post # or date Previous 50 Next 50
PostSubjectPosted ByTime
#127624  Sticky Note OK...HOLD OFF REQUESTING THE DRS.... ohbull2000 11/19/2009 6:40:57 PM
#127531  Sticky Note WOW...849 posts and lots of posters.... ohbull2000 11/18/2009 3:34:14 PM
#123881  Sticky Note BCIT/ENERGY SOURCE INC. FUND INFO ohbull2000 10/3/2009 1:40:55 PM
#127748   amen. daveXV19 11/22/2009 2:37:56 AM
#127746   The only one who is out of line dahbmw 11/21/2009 10:42:27 PM
#127743   Get Megas to come out of the closet turn2him 11/21/2009 10:29:50 PM
#127738   I did not call it dead either. Read turn2him 11/21/2009 9:50:18 PM
#127737   if it's so dead, why waste time posting here? op9171787 11/21/2009 9:49:20 PM
#127736   i am not calling it dead, but i molson_ice1 11/21/2009 9:47:52 PM
#127735   As anyone on this board, you are entitled turn2him 11/21/2009 9:47:13 PM
#127732   understating the obvious :) daveXV19 11/21/2009 8:39:06 PM
#127731   Especially Thomas Megas. dahbmw 11/21/2009 8:21:06 PM
#127730   Word of wisdom: turn2him 11/21/2009 7:10:25 PM
#127729   yes molson_ice1 11/21/2009 6:57:26 PM
#127728   Stock swap, LOL Are we making this stuff Egor 11/21/2009 6:53:16 PM
#127727   Megas is and has done NOTHING, NADDA, ZILCH!!! Egor 11/21/2009 6:43:25 PM
#127726   ...and that Attaway's help is contingent on janice shell 11/21/2009 5:32:52 PM
#127724   To think I actually used to trust this fructose 11/21/2009 4:49:32 PM
#127723   Don't worry because that's not going to happen. dahbmw 11/21/2009 3:42:21 PM
#127722   Some type of stock swap? x amount molson_ice1 11/21/2009 3:39:31 PM
#127721   While your at it, remember these words from Megas=== dahbmw 11/21/2009 3:35:11 PM
#127720   Still no worth while posts to read here. 2late 11/21/2009 3:24:48 PM
#127719   Not anymore.... after 4 years time we got molson_ice1 11/21/2009 2:35:09 PM
#127718   Again remember the words of Megas, time is turn2him 11/21/2009 2:12:54 PM
#127717   What? You seem to forget the big dahbmw 11/21/2009 2:07:21 PM
#127716   That is all fine and dandy, but I molson_ice1 11/21/2009 2:06:04 PM
#127715   The BCIT case is already before the Judge, turn2him 11/21/2009 1:28:32 PM
#127714   Something is not adding up. fructose 11/21/2009 1:22:36 PM
#127713   This is the exact same thing that happened molson_ice1 11/21/2009 1:12:26 PM
#127712   I gotta wonder what his real working email fructose 11/21/2009 1:04:26 PM
#127711   BINGO.... I am also now wondering if Megas molson_ice1 11/21/2009 12:49:57 PM
#127710   What I meant was...we had no warning that mastaflash 11/21/2009 12:25:54 PM
#127709   Are you certain the SEC's timing was just fructose 11/21/2009 12:25:05 PM
#127708   yep, it looks like you did. dahbmw 11/21/2009 12:21:20 PM
#127707   [quote]simply a case of the SEC doing what mastaflash 11/21/2009 12:07:12 PM
#127706   2late, This judge is a government employee working bobbybdb 11/21/2009 11:48:06 AM
#127705   The revocation was not sinister, it was simply dahbmw 11/21/2009 11:42:18 AM
#127704   I agree, the SEC revocation timing was sinister. Arkait 11/21/2009 11:08:25 AM
#127703   How are you going to get this in dahbmw 11/21/2009 9:32:01 AM
#127702   2late: This position on how the judge should view turn2him 11/21/2009 8:01:10 AM
#127701   How many judges have you dealt with in 2late 11/21/2009 1:34:43 AM
#127698   2Late= Haven't you figured out that in this dahbmw 11/20/2009 9:33:39 PM
#127697   2Late- I thoroughly enjoy your posts and wish molson_ice1 11/20/2009 8:39:59 PM
#127695   I think it's dead too and I also Jim Bishop 11/20/2009 8:11:55 PM
#127694   I would think that would be enough to Jim Bishop 11/20/2009 8:03:55 PM
#127693   - Jim Bishop 11/20/2009 8:03:40 PM
#127692   What triggered the revokation is was nothing more daveXV19 11/20/2009 8:03:13 PM
#127691   No. It was a legal action. janice shell 11/20/2009 8:01:45 PM
#127690   while your theories and conjectures do indeed seem daveXV19 11/20/2009 8:01:31 PM
#127689   Thanks Jim.. as far as I'm concerned, this daveXV19 11/20/2009 7:57:05 PM
#127688   Thanks! An "Answer" simply could have been molson_ice1 11/20/2009 7:54:18 PM
#127687   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file Jim Bishop 11/20/2009 7:52:56 PM
#127686   I have not looked at the SEC doc molson_ice1 11/20/2009 7:28:53 PM
new Hangouts -  Surveys -  Bans
Go to Post # or date Previous 50 Next 50